e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number:
000-51863
VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
03-0491827
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
9605 Medical Center Drive, Suite 300
Rockville, Maryland
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
20850
(Zip
Code)
|
(240) 599-4500
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 3, 2009, there were 27,201,978 shares
of the registrants common stock issued and outstanding.
Vanda
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Form 10-Q
Index
For the
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
2
Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,417,647
|
|
|
$
|
39,079,304
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
|
7,378,798
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
2,632,783
|
|
|
|
1,287,400
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,758,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
25,074,032
|
|
|
|
47,745,502
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,411,326
|
|
|
|
1,758,111
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
430,230
|
|
|
|
430,230
|
|
Intangible asset, net
|
|
|
11,393,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
38,309,445
|
|
|
$
|
49,933,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
6,346,236
|
|
|
$
|
512,382
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,046,028
|
|
|
|
2,898,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,392,264
|
|
|
|
3,410,799
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
505,831
|
|
|
|
502,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
8,898,095
|
|
|
|
3,913,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized and none issued and outstanding at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares
authorized as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008; and 27,201,978 and 26,653,478 shares issued and
outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively
|
|
|
27,202
|
|
|
|
26,653
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
280,980,068
|
|
|
|
270,988,157
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(20,029
|
)
|
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(251,595,963
|
)
|
|
|
(224,974,507
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
29,411,350
|
|
|
|
46,020,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
38,309,445
|
|
|
$
|
49,933,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
376,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,143
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,091,984
|
|
|
|
3,792,424
|
|
|
|
11,620,918
|
|
|
|
20,375,998
|
|
|
|
161,206,238
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,266,434
|
|
|
|
7,400,263
|
|
|
|
14,478,786
|
|
|
|
24,814,462
|
|
|
|
100,397,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,735,210
|
|
|
|
11,192,687
|
|
|
|
26,705,847
|
|
|
|
45,190,460
|
|
|
|
262,210,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(7,735,210
|
)
|
|
|
(11,192,687
|
)
|
|
|
(26,705,847
|
)
|
|
|
(45,190,460
|
)
|
|
|
(262,128,461
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9,842
|
|
|
|
323,476
|
|
|
|
84,391
|
|
|
|
1,630,238
|
|
|
|
10,564,062
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,485
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
9,842
|
|
|
|
323,476
|
|
|
|
84,391
|
|
|
|
1,630,238
|
|
|
|
10,555,524
|
|
Loss before tax provision
|
|
|
(7,725,368
|
)
|
|
|
(10,869,211
|
)
|
|
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
|
(43,560,222
|
)
|
|
|
(251,572,937
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7,725,368
|
)
|
|
|
(10,869,211
|
)
|
|
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
|
(43,560,222
|
)
|
|
|
(251,595,963
|
)
|
Beneficial conversion feature deemed dividend to
preferred stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,486,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,725,368
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,869,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,560,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(285,082,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share applicable to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of basic and diluted net loss per
share applicable to common stockholders
|
|
|
27,196,694
|
|
|
|
26,650,534
|
|
|
|
26,920,742
|
|
|
|
26,649,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
During the
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Development Stage
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
26,653,478
|
|
|
$
|
26,653
|
|
|
$
|
270,988,157
|
|
|
$
|
(20,029
|
)
|
|
$
|
(224,974,507
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,020,274
|
|
Issuance of common stock from exercised stock options/restricted
stock units
|
|
|
548,500
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
1,283,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283,734
|
|
Employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,320,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,320,399
|
|
Non-employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,327
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(26,601,384
|
)
|
|
|
(26,601,384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
27,201,978
|
|
|
$
|
27,202
|
|
|
$
|
280,980,068
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(251,595,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,411,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2003
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,560,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251,595,963
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
346,785
|
|
|
|
403,141
|
|
|
|
2,846,447
|
|
Employee and non-employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8,708,726
|
|
|
|
12,679,311
|
|
|
|
53,032,038
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
57,458
|
|
Amortization of discounts and premiums on marketable securities
|
|
|
122,963
|
|
|
|
(212,664
|
)
|
|
|
(2,104,357
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
606,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,143
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,345,383
|
)
|
|
|
(1,160,103
|
)
|
|
|
(2,632,783
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(1,758,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,758,427
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
833,854
|
|
|
|
(2,089,044
|
)
|
|
|
1,346,236
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(852,389
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708,552
|
)
|
|
|
2,046,028
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
|
|
142,732
|
|
|
|
505,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(19,956,123
|
)
|
|
|
(40,505,574
|
)
|
|
|
(197,651,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of intangible asset
|
|
|
(7,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000,000
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(943,659
|
)
|
|
|
(4,381,391
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,179
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(11,365,815
|
)
|
|
|
(11,491,577
|
)
|
|
|
(279,184,558
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
126,547
|
|
|
|
10,373,251
|
|
|
|
97,100,390
|
|
Maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
15,250,000
|
|
|
|
42,060,000
|
|
|
|
180,925,000
|
|
Investment in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(2,989,268
|
)
|
|
|
39,998,015
|
|
|
|
(12,770,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings on note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,147
|
|
Principal payments on obligations under capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,797
|
)
|
Principal payments on note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(515,147
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,795,187
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
1,283,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591,243
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,588,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,283,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,883,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,745
|
|
|
|
(43,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21,661,657
|
)
|
|
|
(490,814
|
)
|
|
|
17,417,647
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
39,079,304
|
|
|
|
41,929,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
17,417,647
|
|
|
$
|
41,438,719
|
|
|
$
|
17,417,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset acquisition included in accounts payable
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
6
|
|
1.
|
Business
Organization and Presentation
|
Business
organization
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Vanda or the Company) is a
biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and
commercialization of small molecule therapeutics for various
central nervous system disorders. Vanda commenced its operations
in 2003. The Companys lead product, iloperidone, which the
Company expects to be marketed by Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis)
under the tradename
Fanapttm
in the U.S. beginning in the first quarter of 2010, is a
compound for the treatment of schizophrenia. On May 6,
2009, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
granted U.S. marketing approval of
Fanapttm
for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in adults. On
October 12, 2009, Vanda entered into an amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis. Vanda had
originally entered into a sublicense agreement with Novartis on
June 4, 2004 pursuant to which Vanda obtained certain
worldwide exclusive licenses from Novartis relating to
Fanapttm.
The amended and restated sublicense agreement is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act), which is expected
by the end of 2009. Pursuant to the amended and restated
sublicense agreement, Novartis will have exclusive
commercialization rights to all formulations of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Except for two post-approval
studies started by Vanda prior to the execution date of the
amended and restated sublicense agreement, which Vanda is
obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for the
further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a long-acting injectable
(or depot) formulation of
Fanapttm.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated sublicense
agreement, Vanda will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which it expects to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. Vanda
will be eligible for additional payments totaling up to
$265.0 million upon the achievement of certain commercial
and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Vanda will also receive royalties,
which, as a percentage of net sales, are in the low
double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, Vanda will no longer
be required to make any future milestone payments with respect
to sales of
Fanapttm
or any future royalty payments with respect to sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Vanda retains exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada and Vanda will have exclusive
rights to use any of Novartis data for
Fanapttm
for developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. At Novartis option,
Vanda will enter into good faith discussions with Novartis
relating to the co-commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada or, alternatively, Novartis
will receive a royalty on net sales of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada.
Tasimelteon is a compound for the treatment of sleep and mood
disorders including Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders (CRSD). The
compound binds selectively to the brains melatonin
receptors, which are thought to govern the bodys natural
sleep/wake cycle. Compounds that bind selectively to these
receptors are thought to be able to help treat sleep disorders,
and additionally are believed to offer potential benefits in
mood disorders. In November 2006, Vanda announced positive
top-line results from the Phase III trial of tasimelteon in
transient insomnia. In June 2008, the Company announced positive
top-line results from the Phase III trial of tasimelteon in
chronic primary insomnia. The Company believes that tasimelteon
may be effective in the treatment of insomnia caused by jet lag.
The Company met with the FDA in June 2009 in an end of
Phase II meeting to discuss the clinical development plan
for the insomnia of jet lag disorder indication and will
continue to work with the FDA to characterize the path to a New
Drug Application (NDA) for tasimelteon. Tasimelteon is also
ready for Phase II trials for the treatment of depression.
Capital
resources
Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all
of its efforts to business planning, research and development,
market research, recruiting management and technical staff,
acquiring operating assets and raising capital. Accordingly, the
Company is considered to be in the development stage.
7
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The Companys activities will necessitate significant uses
of working capital throughout 2009 and beyond. Vanda is
currently concentrating its efforts on the transition of the
commercialization and development rights to
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada to Novartis and expects to work with
Novartis, including exchanging information via the joint
steering committee established pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, to assist Novartis
anticipated commercial launch of
Fanapttm
in the first quarter of 2010. The transition includes all
regulatory, manufacturing and certain post-marketing commitments
requested by the FDA. Under the terms of the amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, except for two
post-approval studies started by Vanda prior to the execution
date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement, which
Vanda is obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for
the further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a depot formulation of
Fanapttm.
Vanda will also continue to work closely with the FDA on the
path forward for tasimelteon. The Company expects to continue to
operate on a reduced spending plan with its fixed overhead costs
expected to be approximately $2.5 million to
$3.0 million per quarter.
Basis
of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned Singapore subsidiary that ceased operations during
2007. All inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of Vanda have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) and the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial information.
Accordingly, they do not include all the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and
should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008 included in the Companys annual
report on
Form 10-K/A.
The financial information as of September 30, 2009 and for
the periods of the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from
March 13, 2003 (inception) to September 30, 2009, is
unaudited, but in the opinion of management all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring accruals, considered
necessary for a fair statement of the results of these interim
periods have been included. The condensed consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2008 was derived from audited
financial statements but does not include all disclosures
required by GAAP.
The results of the Companys operations for any interim
period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for any other interim period or for a full fiscal year.
The financial information included herein should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
in the Companys annual report incorporated by reference in
the
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
8
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Cash
and cash equivalents
For purposes of the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, cash
equivalents represent highly-liquid investments with a maturity
date of three months or less at the date of purchase.
Marketable
securities
The Company classifies all of its marketable securities as
available-for-sale
securities. The Companys investment policy requires the
selection of high-quality issuers, with bond ratings of AAA to
A1+/P1.
Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair market value, with unrealized
gains and losses reported as a component of stockholders
equity in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss. Interest
and dividend income is recorded when earned and included in
interest income. Premiums and discounts on marketable securities
are amortized and accreted, respectively, to maturity and
included in interest income. The Company uses the specific
identification method in computing realized gains and losses on
the sale of investments, which would be included in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations when generated.
Inventory
The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or net
realizable value. The Company analyzes its inventory levels
quarterly and writes down inventory that has become obsolete, or
has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value
and inventory quantities in excess of expected requirements.
Expired inventory is disposed of and the related costs are
written off to cost of sales. Prior to FDA approval, all
Fanapttm
manufacturing-related costs were included in research and
development expenses. Subsequent to FDA approval of
Fanapttm,
manufacturing costs related to this product are capitalized.
Intangible
asset, net
Costs incurred for products or product candidates not yet
approved by the FDA and for which no alternative future use
exists are recorded as expense. In the event a product or
product candidate has been approved by the FDA or an alternative
future use exists for a product or product candidate, patent and
license costs are capitalized and amortized over the expected
patent life of the related product or product candidate.
Milestone payments to the Companys collaborators are
recognized when it is deemed probable that the milestone event
will occur.
As a result of the FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
the Company met a milestone under its original sublicense
agreement with Novartis which required the Company to make a
license payment of $12.0 million to Novartis. Of the
$12.0 million milestone payment, $7.0 million was paid
in May 2009 and the remaining $5.0 million was paid in
October 2009. The $12.0 million is being amortized on a
straight line basis over the remaining life of the
U.S. patent for
Fanapttm,
which the Company expects to last until May 15, 2017. This
includes the Hatch-Waxman extension that provides patent
protection for drug compounds for a period of up to five years
to compensate for time spent in development and a six-month
pediatric term extension. This term is the Companys best
estimate of the life of the patent; if, however, the
Hatch-Waxman or pediatric extensions are not granted, the
intangible asset will be amortized over a shorter period.
Amortization of the intangible asset is recorded as a component
of cost of goods sold.
The carrying values of intangible assets are periodically
reviewed to determine if the facts and circumstances suggest
that a potential impairment may have occurred. The Company had
no impairments of its intangible assets for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
9
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Concentrations
of credit risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company
places its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities with
what the Company believes to be highly-rated financial
institutions. At September 30, 2009, the Company maintained
all of its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in
three financial institutions. Deposits held with these
institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such
deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand,
and the Company believes there is minimal risk of losses on such
balances.
Employee
stock-based compensation
The Company accounts for the stock-based compensation expenses
in accordance with the FASB guidance on share-based payments
adopted on January 1, 2006. Accordingly, compensation costs
for all stock-based awards to employees and directors are
measured based on the grant date fair value of those awards and
recognized over the period during which the employee or director
is required to perform service in exchange for the award. The
Company generally recognizes the expense over the awards
vesting period.
For stock awards subsequent to 2006, the fair value of these
awards are amortized using the accelerated attribution method.
For stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, expenses
are amortized under the accelerated attribution method for
options that were modified after the original grant date and
under the straight-line attribution method for all other
options. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. Forfeitures are required to be estimated at the
time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Pre-vesting
forfeitures on the options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
were estimated to be approximately 2% and was increased to 4% in
2009 based on the Companys historical experience. In the
periods prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred. The cumulative effect adjustment
of adopting the change in estimating forfeitures was not
considered material to the Companys financial statements
for periods prior to January 1, 2006.
Total employee stock-based compensation expense recognized
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 and the period from March 13, 2003 (inception) to
September 30, 2009 was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
707,646
|
|
|
$
|
504,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,517,324
|
|
|
$
|
2,357,015
|
|
|
$
|
9,057,513
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,555,576
|
|
|
|
3,115,679
|
|
|
|
6,803,075
|
|
|
|
10,349,328
|
|
|
|
43,438,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,263,222
|
|
|
$
|
3,620,365
|
|
|
$
|
8,320,399
|
|
|
$
|
12,706,343
|
|
|
$
|
52,495,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense per basic and diluted share of
common stock
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of stock-based compensation expense
per share
|
|
|
27,196,694
|
|
|
|
26,650,534
|
|
|
|
26,920,742
|
|
|
|
26,649,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
As of September 30, 2009, approximately $8.8 million
of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.33 years.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had two equity
incentive plans, the Second Amended and Restated Management
Equity Plan (the 2004 Plan) and the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
(the 2006 Plan) that were adopted in December 2004 and April
2006, respectively. An aggregate of 1,033,910 shares were
subject to outstanding options granted under the 2004 Plan as of
September 30, 2009, and no additional options will be
granted under this plan. As of September 30, 2009 there are
4,061,684 shares of the Companys common stock
reserved under the 2006 Plan of which 3,287,082 shares were
subject to outstanding options and restricted stock units issued
to employees and non-employees.
Options are subject to terms and conditions established by the
compensation committee of the board of directors. None of the
stock-based awards are classified as a liability as of
September 30, 2009. Option awards have
10-year
contractual terms and all options granted prior to
December 31, 2006, options granted to new employees, and
certain options granted to existing employees vest and become
exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date with
respect to 25% of the shares subject to the option awards. The
remaining 75% of the shares subject to the option awards vest
and become exercisable monthly in equal installments thereafter
over three years. Certain option awards granted to existing
employees after December 31, 2006 vest and become
exercisable monthly in equal installments over four years. The
initial stock options granted to directors upon their election
vest and become exercisable in equal monthly installments over a
period of four years, while the subsequent annual stock option
grants to directors vest and become exercisable in equal monthly
installments over a period of one year. Certain option awards to
executives and directors provide for accelerated vesting if
there is a change in control of the Company. Certain option
awards to employees and executives provide for accelerated
vesting if the respective employees or executives
service is terminated by the Company for any reason other than
cause or permanent disability.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model that
uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected
volatility rates are based on historical volatility of the
common stock of comparable entities and other factors due to the
lack of historic information of the Companys publicly
traded common stock. The expected term of options granted is
based on the transition approach provided by FASB guidance as
the options meet the plain vanilla criteria required
by this guidance. The risk-free interest rates are based on the
U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the
expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant.
The Company has not paid dividends to its stockholders since its
inception and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future.
Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing
model for employee and director stock options granted during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average expected volatility
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
Weighted average expected term (years)
|
|
|
6.03
|
|
|
|
6.03
|
|
Weighted average risk-free rate
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
11
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
A summary of option activity for the 2004 Plan is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Remaining Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
at Grant Date
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,154,248
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(93,545
|
)
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(26,793
|
)
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,033,910
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
|
|
$
|
10,451,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,016,751
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
$
|
10,362,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of option activity for the 2006 Plan is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Remaining Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
at Grant Date
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,631,381
|
|
|
$
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
965,000
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(143,455
|
)
|
|
|
6.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(196,443
|
)
|
|
|
23.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(299,901
|
)
|
|
|
13.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,956,582
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
8.39
|
|
|
$
|
5,569,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,276,690
|
|
|
|
20.53
|
|
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
$
|
2,420,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $8.07
per share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, the Company received a total of $1,283,734 and $0,
respectively, in cash from options exercised under the
stock-based arrangements.
Restricted stock is a stock award that entitles the holder to
receive shares of the Companys common stock as the award
vests. The Company issued restricted stock to all employees who
remained with the Company following the workforce reduction in
December 2008 and key consultants retained by the Company. Of
the RSUs issued in 2008 to the retained employees, 50% of the
shares vested upon approval by the FDA of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
and 50% of the shares vest on December 31, 2009. Upon a
change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested RSUs will
vest. The fair value of each restricted stock award was based on
the closing price of the Companys stock on the date of
grant which equals the RSUs intrinsic value. As of
September 30, 2009, there was approximately $321,981 of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
restricted stock awards granted under the Companys stock
incentive plans. The majority of the cost is expected to be
recognized through December 2009.
12
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
A summary of restricted stock activity for the 2006 Plan is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price/Share
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
623,000
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
311,500
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(311,500
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
330,500
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
3,847,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
Management is required to estimate accrued expenses as part of
the process of preparing financial statements. The estimation of
accrued expenses involves identifying services that have been
performed on the Companys behalf, and then estimating the
level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for
such services as of each balance sheet date in the financial
statements. Accrued expenses include professional service fees,
such as lawyers and accountants, contract service fees, such as
those under contracts with clinical monitors, data management
organizations and investigators in conjunction with clinical
trials, fees to contract manufacturers in conjunction with the
production of clinical materials, fees for marketing and other
commercialization activities, and severance related costs due to
the Companys workforce reduction which occurred in the
fourth quarter of 2008. Pursuant to managements assessment
of the services that have been performed on clinical trials and
other contracts, the Company recognizes these expenses as the
services are provided. Such management assessments include, but
are not limited to: (1) an evaluation by the project
manager of the work that has been completed during the period,
(2) measurement of progress prepared internally
and/or
provided by the third-party service provider, (3) analyses
of data that justify the progress, and
(4) managements judgment.
Research
and development expenses
The Companys research and development expenses consist
primarily of fees for services provided by third parties in
connection with the clinical trials, costs of contract
manufacturing services, milestone license fees, costs of
materials used in clinical trials and research and development,
cost for regulatory consultants and filings, depreciation of
capital resources used to develop products, related facilities
costs, and salaries, other employee related costs and
stock-based compensation for the research and development
personnel. The Company expenses research and development costs
as they are incurred for compounds in development stage,
including certain payments made under the license agreements.
Prior to FDA approval, all
Fanapttm
manufacturing-related and milestone costs were included in
research and development expenses. Post FDA approval of
Fanapttm,
manufacturing and milestone costs related to this product are
being capitalized. Costs related to the acquisitions of
intellectual property have been expensed as incurred since the
underlying technology associated with these acquisitions were
made in connection with the Companys research and
development efforts and have no alternative future use.
Milestone payments are accrued in accordance with the FASB
guidance on accounting for contingencies, when it is deemed
probable that the milestone event will be achieved.
General
and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries, other employee related costs and stock-based
compensation for personnel serving executive, business
development, marketing, finance, accounting, information
technology and human resource functions, facility costs not
otherwise included in research and development expenses,
insurance costs and professional fees for legal, accounting and
other professional
13
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
services. General and administrative expenses also include third
party expenses incurred to support business development,
marketing and other business activities related to
Fanapttm.
Income
taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method
in accordance with the FASB provisions on accounting for income
taxes, which requires companies to account for deferred income
taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and
liability method, current income tax expense or benefit is the
amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for
the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is
recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate
changes are reflected in income during the period such changes
are enacted. Changes in ownership may limit the amount of net
operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized in the future
to offset taxable income.
Segment
information
Management has determined that the Company operates in one
business segment which is the development and commercialization
of pharmaceutical products.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance on subsequent events which
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
Corporate financial statements are considered issued when they
are widely distributed to shareholders and other financial
statement users for general use and reliance in a
form and format that complies with GAAP. Financial statements
are considered available to be issued when they are in a form
and format that complies with GAAP. The FASB guidance provides
that companies should recognize in the financial statements the
effects of all subsequent events that provide additional
evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the
balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process
of preparing financial statements. The Company has implemented
this new standard with no material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued the accounting standards
codification and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting
principles. This guidance identifies the source of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles used
in the preparation of financial statements. The guidance is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Company has updated its financial
statement disclosures as appropriate upon adoption of this
standard in the third quarter of 2009.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is
calculated in accordance with FASB guidance on earnings per
share. Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing
the net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding, reduced by the weighted average unvested shares of
common stock subject to repurchase.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income or loss
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of other potential common stock outstanding for the
period. Other potential common stock includes stock options,
warrants and restricted stock units, but only to the extent that
their inclusion is
14
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
dilutive. The Company incurred a net loss in all periods
presented, causing inclusion of any potentially dilutive
securities to have an anti-dilutive affect, resulting in
dilutive loss per share attributable to common stockholders and
basic loss per share attributable to common stockholders being
equivalent. The Company did not have any common shares issued
for nominal consideration as defined under the FASB terms, which
would be included in EPS calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(7,725,368
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,869,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,621,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,560,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
27,196,694
|
|
|
|
26,652,728
|
|
|
|
26,920,742
|
|
|
|
26,652,728
|
|
Weighted average unvested shares of common stock subject to
repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
27,196,694
|
|
|
|
26,650,534
|
|
|
|
26,920,742
|
|
|
|
26,649,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share applicable to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive securities not included in diluted net loss per
share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock and restricted stock units
|
|
|
4,320,992
|
|
|
|
4,255,488
|
|
|
|
4,320,992
|
|
|
|
4,255,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys
available-for-sale
marketable securities as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
$
|
3,265,132
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,132
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following is a summary of the Companys
available-for-sale
marketable securities as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
$
|
1,992,452
|
|
|
$
|
7,408
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,860
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
5,279,828
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
(29,818
|
)
|
|
|
5,252,346
|
|
U.S. asset-based securities
|
|
|
126,547
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,398,827
|
|
|
$
|
9,789
|
|
|
$
|
(29,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,378,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Prepaid
Expenses, Deposits and Other Current Assets
|
The following is a summary of the Companys prepaid
expenses, deposits and other current assets, as of
September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current deposits with vendors
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
438,564
|
|
|
|
282,391
|
|
Accrued interest income
|
|
|
49,614
|
|
|
|
53,378
|
|
Other prepaid expenses and advances
|
|
|
1,934,605
|
|
|
|
326,201
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
415,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,632,783
|
|
|
$
|
1,287,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
439,607
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,318,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory, net
|
|
$
|
1,758,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, Novartis will be obligated to purchase all
Fanapttm
inventory following the effective date of the agreement, subject
to such inventory meeting certain requirements.
16
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
The following is a summary of the Companys property and
equipment at cost, as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Laboratory equipment
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,348,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,348,098
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
776,921
|
|
|
|
776,921
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
705,784
|
|
|
|
705,784
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
844,158
|
|
|
|
844,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,674,961
|
|
|
|
3,674,961
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,263,635
|
)
|
|
|
(1,916,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,326
|
|
|
$
|
1,758,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $346,785 and $403,141,
respectively, and for the period from March 13, 2003
(inception) to September 30, 2009 was $2,846,447.
The intangible asset consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Lives
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fanapttm
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
606,143
|
|
|
$
|
11,393,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
606,143
|
|
|
$
|
11,393,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 6, 2009, the Company announced that the FDA had
approved the NDA for
Fanapttm.
As a result of the FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
it met a milestone under its original sublicense agreement with
Novartis which required the Company to make a license payment of
$12.0 million to Novartis. Of the $12.0 million
milestone payment, $7.0 million was paid in May 2009 and
the remaining $5.0 million was paid in October 2009. The
$12.0 million is being amortized on a straight line basis
over the remaining life of the U.S. patent for
Fanapttm,
which the Company expects to last until May 15, 2017. This
includes the Hatch-Waxman extension that provides patent
protection for drug compounds for a period of up to five years
to compensate for time spent in development and a six-month
pediatric term extension. This term is the Companys best
estimate of the life of the patent; if, however, the
Hatch-Waxman or pediatric extensions are not granted, the
intangible asset will be amortized over a shorter period.
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
economic life using the straight line method. Amortization
expense was $606,143 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The estimated annual amortization
expense for intangible assets is approximately $1.0 million
in 2009, $1.5 million in 2010, $1.5 million in 2011,
$1.5 million in 2012 and $6.5 from 2013 through 2017. The
Company capitalized and began amortizing the asset immediately
following the FDA approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm.
17
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following is a summary of accrued liabilities, as of
September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accrued research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
612,584
|
|
|
$
|
925,124
|
|
Accrued consulting and other professional fees
|
|
|
1,008,139
|
|
|
|
233,829
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
196,466
|
|
|
|
126,816
|
|
Accrued severance
|
|
|
228,839
|
|
|
|
1,612,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,046,028
|
|
|
$
|
2,898,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
leases
The Company has commitments totaling approximately
$5.2 million under operating real estate leases for its
headquarters located in Rockville, Maryland, expiring in 2016.
Severance
payments
On December 16, 2008, the Company committed to a plan of
termination that resulted in a work force reduction of
17 employees, including two officers, in order to reduce
operating costs. The Company commenced notification of employees
affected by the workforce reduction on December 17, 2008.
The following table summarizes the activity in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 for the liability for the cash
portion of severance costs related to the
reductions-in-force:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Cash Paid
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Workforce Reduction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research Development
|
|
$
|
571,391
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
483,988
|
|
|
$
|
87,403
|
|
General & Administrative
|
|
|
1,041,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899,821
|
|
|
|
141,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,612,648
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,809
|
|
|
$
|
228,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting
fees
The Company engaged a regulatory consultant to assist in the
Companys efforts to obtain FDA approval of the
Fanapttm
NDA. The Company committed to initial consulting expenses in the
aggregate amount of $2.0 million pursuant to this
engagement, which was expensed in 2008. In addition, the Company
retained the services of the consultant on a monthly basis at a
retainer fee of $250,000 per month effective as of
January 1, 2009. The Company was obligated to pay the
consultant a success fee of $6.0 million as a result of the
approval by the FDA of its NDA for
Fanapttm,
which was fully expensed in May 2009 and was offset by the
aggregate amount of all monthly retainer fees previously paid to
the consultant (Success Fee). Through September 30, 2009,
the Company paid $5.0 million to the consultant. The
Success Fee was paid monthly in $1.0 million increments
with the last payment occurring in October 2009. In addition to
these fees, the Company reimbursed the consultant for its
ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred in connection
with its engagement.
The Company also engaged financial advisors and consultants to
act as strategic advisors to the Company in connection with a
proposed transaction or partnership involving the possible sale,
partnership, or other
18
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
business combination of the Company. Pursuant to agreements with
such strategic advisors, Vanda is obligated to pay an aggregate
success fee of approximately $3.5 million following the
effective date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement
with Novartis, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009.
Guarantees
and indemnifications
The Company has entered into a number of standard intellectual
property indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
its business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company
indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party, generally the Companys business
partners or customers, in connection with any U.S. patent
or any copyright or other intellectual property infringement
claim by any third party with respect to the Companys
products. The term of these indemnification agreements is
generally perpetual from the date of execution of the agreement.
The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company
could be required to make under these indemnification agreements
is unlimited. Since inception, the Company has not incurred
costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these
indemnification agreements. The Company also indemnifies its
officers and directors for certain events or occurrences,
subject to certain limits. The Company believes that the fair
value of the indemnification agreements is minimal, and
accordingly the Company has not recognized any liabilities
relating to these agreements as of September 30, 2009.
License
agreements
The Companys rights to develop and commercialize its
products are subject to the terms and conditions of licenses
granted to the Company by other pharmaceutical companies.
Fanapttm.
The Company acquired exclusive worldwide rights to patents
for
Fanapttm,
previously known as iloperidone, in 2004 through a sublicense
agreement with Novartis. A predecessor company of
sanofi-aventis, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (HMRI), discovered
iloperidone and completed early clinical work on the compound.
In 1996, following a review of its product portfolio, HMRI
licensed its rights to the iloperidone patents to Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Titan) on an exclusive basis. In 1997,
soon after it had acquired its rights, Titan sublicensed its
rights to iloperidone on an exclusive basis to Novartis. In June
2004, the Company acquired exclusive worldwide rights to these
patents as well as certain Novartis patents to develop and
commercialize iloperidone through a sublicense agreement with
Novartis. In partial consideration for this sublicense, the
Company paid Novartis an initial license fee of $500,000 and was
obligated to make future milestone payments to Novartis of less
than $100.0 million in the aggregate (the majority of which
were tied to sales milestones), as well as royalty payments to
Novartis at a rate which, as a percentage of net sales, was in
the mid-twenties. In November 2007, the Company met a milestone
under this sublicense agreement relating to the acceptance of
its filing of the NDA for
Fanapttm
for the treatment of schizophrenia and made a corresponding
payment of $5.0 million to Novartis. As a result of the
FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
the Company met an additional milestone under this sublicense
agreement which required the Company to make a license payment
of $12.0 million to Novartis. Of the $12.0 million
milestone payment, $7.0 million was paid in May 2009 and
the remaining $5.0 million was paid in October 2009.
On October 12, 2009, Vanda entered into an amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis which amended and
restated the June 2004 sublicense agreement with Novartis. The
amended and restated sublicense agreement is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act, which
is expected by the end of 2009. Pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, Novartis will have exclusive
commercialization rights to all formulations of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Except for two post-approval
studies started by Vanda prior to the execution date of the
amended and restated sublicense agreement, which Vanda is
obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for the
further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a long-acting injectable
(or
19
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
depot) formulation of
Fanapttm.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated sublicense
agreement, Vanda will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which Vanda expects to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. Vanda
will be eligible for additional payments totaling up to
$265.0 million upon the achievement of certain commercial
and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Vanda will also receive royalties,
which, as a percentage of net sales, are in the low
double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, Vanda will no longer
be required to make any future milestone payments with respect
to sales of
Fanapttm
or any future royalty payments with respect to sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Vanda retains exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada and Vanda will have exclusive
rights to use any of Novartis data for
Fanapttm
for developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. At Novartis option,
Vanda will enter into good faith discussions with Novartis
relating to the co-commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada or, alternatively, Novartis
will receive a royalty on net sales of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada.
Vanda may lose its rights to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada if it fails to comply with
certain requirements in the amended and restated sublicense
agreement regarding its financial condition, or if Vanda fails
to comply with certain diligence obligations regarding its
development activities or if Vanda otherwise breaches the
amended and restated sublicense agreement and fails to cure such
breach. Vandas rights to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada may be impaired if it does not
cure breaches by Novartis of similar obligations contained its
sublicense agreement with Titan for
Fanapttm.
Vanda is not aware of any such breach by Novartis. In addition,
if Novartis breaches the amended and restated sublicense
agreement with respect to its commercialization activities in
the U.S. or Canada, Vanda may terminate Novartis
commercialization rights in the applicable country and Vanda
would no longer receive royalty payments from Novartis in
connection with such country in the event of such termination.
Tasimelteon. In February 2004, the Company
entered into a license agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)
under which the Company received an exclusive worldwide license
under certain patents and patent applications, and other
licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize
tasimelteon. In partial consideration for the license, the
Company paid BMS an initial license fee of $500,000 and is
obligated to make future milestone payments to BMS of less than
$40.0 million in the aggregate (the majority of which are
tied to sales milestones) as well as royalty payments based on
the net sales of tasimelteon at a rate which, as a percentage of
net sales, is in the low teens. The Company made a milestone
payment to BMS of $1.0 million under this license agreement
in 2006 relating to the initiation of the Phase III
clinical trial for tasimelteon. The Company is also obligated
under this agreement to pay BMS a percentage of any sublicense
fees, upfront payments and milestone and other payments
(excluding royalties) that the Company receives from a third
party in connection with any sublicensing arrangement, at a rate
which is in the mid-twenties. The Company has agreed with BMS in
the license agreement for tasimelteon to use commercially
reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize tasimelteon and
to meet certain milestones in initiating and completing certain
clinical work.
BMS holds certain rights with respect to tasimelteon in the
license agreement. If the Company has not agreed to one or more
partnering arrangements to develop and commercialize tasimelteon
in certain significant markets with one or more third parties
after the completion of the Phase III program, BMS has the
option to exclusively develop and commercialize tasimelteon on
its own on pre-determined financial terms, including milestone
and royalty payments.
Either party may terminate the tasimelteon license agreement
under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the
agreement by the other. In the event that BMS has not exercised
its option to reacquire the rights to tasimelteon and the
Company terminates the license, or if BMS terminates the license
due to the Companys breach, all rights licensed and
developed by the Company under this agreement will revert or
otherwise be licensed back to BMS on an exclusive basis.
20
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Future license payments. No amounts were
recorded as liabilities other than the $5.0 million
milestone payment due to Novartis with respect to the FDA
approval of
Fanapttm
which was paid in October 2009, nor were any contractual
obligations relating to the license agreements included in the
condensed consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2009, since the amounts, timing and
likelihood of these future payments are unknown and will depend
on the successful outcome of future clinical trials, regulatory
filings, favorable FDA regulatory approvals, growth in product
sales and other factors.
Research
and development and marketing agreements
In the course of its business the Company regularly enters into
agreements with clinical organizations to provide services
relating to clinical development and clinical manufacturing
activities under fee service arrangements. The Companys
current agreements for clinical services may be terminated on no
more than 60 days notice without incurring additional
charges, other than charges for work completed but not paid for
through the effective date of termination and other costs
incurred by the Companys contractors in closing out work
in progress as of the effective date of termination. The Company
currently is committed to $5.7 million in outstanding
manufacturing purchase orders for the commercial supply of
Fanapttm.
These commitments will be assumed by Novartis upon the effective
date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009.
Pursuant to the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, we are obligated to continue work on two post-approval
studies, which we started prior to the execution date of such
agreement. The cash obligation with respect to these two studies
is approximately $728,000.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the FASB guidance
relating to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations. In
addition, there are no uncertain tax positions whose resolution
in the next twelve months is expected to materially affect
operating results. The Company accounts for income taxes using
the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are
recognized by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to
future years to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date. The measurement of deferred
tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance
for any tax benefits for which future realization is uncertain.
The Company has not recorded any tax provision or benefit for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008. The
Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full amount
of its net deferred tax assets since realization of any future
benefit from deductible temporary differences and net operating
loss cannot be sufficiently assured at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008.
Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the amounts of and benefits
from the operating loss carryforwards may be impaired in certain
circumstances. Events which cause limitations in the amount of
net operating losses that the Company may utilize in any one
year include, but are not limited to, a cumulative ownership
change of more than 50%, as defined, over a three year period.
Trading in shares of the Companys common stock has
resulted in ownership changes as defined in
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code). As a result, the Companys net
operating loss carry forwards totaling $123.7 million at
December 31, 2008 are subject to an annual limitation
pursuant to the provisions of Section 382 of the Code,
which the Company estimates to be significant.
21
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance on fair value
measurements which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB agreed to delay the effective date of this guidance for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company has adopted the provisions
of the guidance as of January 1, 2008 and January 1,
2009, for financial instruments and non financial instruments,
respectively. Although the adoption of this guidance did not
materially impact its financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flow, the Company is now required to provide
additional disclosures as part of its financial statements.
FASB guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These
tiers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets
|
|
|
|
Level 2 defined as inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company held certain assets
that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis. The Company makes use of observable market based inputs
to calculate fair value, in which case the measurements are
classified within Level 1. The Company currently does not
have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The
following is a summary of the Companys assets that are
required to be measured at fair value as of September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,175
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys assets that are
required to be measured at fair value as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
7,378,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,860
|
|
|
$
|
5,378,938
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,378,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,860
|
|
|
$
|
5,378,938
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events
through November 4, 2009, which is the date the financial
statements were issued.
22
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Various statements in this report are forward-looking
statements under the securities laws. Words such as, but
not limited to, believe, expect,
anticipate, estimate,
intend, plan, targets,
likely, will, would, and
could, and similar expressions or words, identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based
upon current expectations that involve risks, changes in
circumstances, assumptions and uncertainties. Vanda
Pharmaceuticals Inc. (We, Vanda or the Company) is at an early
stage of development and may not ever have any products that
generate significant revenue. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those reflected in our
forward-looking statements include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the extent and effectiveness of the development, sales and
marketing and distribution support
Fanapttm
receives;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada;
|
|
|
|
delays in the completion of our or our partners clinical trials
for our products, product candidates or partnered products;
|
|
|
|
a failure of our products, product candidates or partnered
products to be demonstrably safe and effective;
|
|
|
|
our or our partners failure to obtain regulatory approval
for our products, product candidates or partnered products or to
comply with ongoing regulatory requirements for our products or
partnered products;
|
|
|
|
a lack of acceptance of our products or partnered products in
the marketplace, or a failure to become or remain profitable;
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding trends with respect to our costs and
expenses;
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain the capital necessary to fund our
commercial, research and development activities;
|
|
|
|
our failure to identify or obtain rights to new products or
product candidates;
|
|
|
|
our failure to develop or obtain sales, marketing and
distribution resources and expertise or to otherwise manage our
growth;
|
|
|
|
a loss of any of our key scientists or management personnel;
|
|
|
|
losses incurred from product liability claims made against us or
our partners related to our products, product candidates or
partnered products; and
|
|
|
|
a loss of rights to develop and commercialize our products,
product candidates or partnered products under our license and
sublicense agreements.
|
All written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable
to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or
referred to in this section. We caution investors not to rely
too heavily on the forward-looking statements we make or that
are made on our behalf. We undertake no obligation, and
specifically decline any obligation, to update or revise
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
We encourage you to read the discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and our condensed consolidated financial
statements contained in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
We also encourage you to read Item 1A of Part II of
this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q,
entitled Risk Factors, which contains a more
complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated
with our business. In addition to the risks described above and
in Item 1A of Part II of this report, other unknown or
unpredictable factors also could affect our results. There can
be no assurance that the actual results or developments
anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially
realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or
effects on, us. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the
outcomes stated in such forward-looking statements and estimates
will be achieved.
23
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development
and commercialization of clinical-stage products for central
nervous system disorders. We believe that each of our products
and partnered products will address a large market with
significant unmet medical needs by offering advantages over
currently available therapies. Our product portfolio includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Fanapttm
(iloperidone), a compound for the treatment of schizophrenia. On
October 12, 2009, we entered into an amended and restated
sublicense agreement with Novartis. We had originally entered
into a sublicense agreement with Novartis on June 4, 2004
pursuant to which we obtained certain worldwide exclusive
licenses from Novartis relating to
Fanapttm.
The amended and restated sublicense agreement is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act, which
is expected by the end of 2009. Pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, Novartis will have exclusive
commercialization rights to all formulations of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We currently expect that Novartis
will begin selling
Fanapttm
in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2010. Except for
two post-approval studies started by us prior to the execution
date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement, which we
are obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for the
further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a long-acting injectable
(or depot) formulation of
Fanapttm.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated sublicense
agreement, we will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which we expect to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. We will
be eligible for additional payments totaling up to
$265.0 million upon the achievement of certain commercial
and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We will also receive royalties,
which, as a percentage of net sales, are in the low
double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, we will no longer be
required to make any future milestone payments with respect to
sales of
Fanapttm
or any future royalty payments with respect to sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We retain exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada and we will have exclusive
rights to use any of Novartis data for
Fanapttm
for developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. At Novartis option, we
will enter into good faith discussions with Novartis relating to
the co-commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada or, alternatively, Novartis
will receive a royalty on net sales of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada.
|
|
|
|
Tasimelteon, a compound for the treatment of sleep and mood
disorders, including Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders. In
November 2006, we announced positive top-line results from the
Phase III trial of tasimelteon in transient insomnia. In
June 2008, we announced positive top-line results from the
Phase III trial of tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia.
In addition, we believe that tasimelteon may be effective in the
treatment of insomnia caused by jet lag. We met with the FDA in
June 2009 for an end of Phase II meeting to discuss the
clinical development plan. We will continue to work with the FDA
to characterize the path to a NDA for tasimelteon. Tasimelteon
is also ready for Phase II trials for the treatment of
depression. Given the range of potential indications for
tasimelteon, we intend to pursue one or more partnerships for
the development and commercialization of tasimelteon worldwide.
|
We are a development stage enterprise and have accumulated net
losses of approximately $251.6 million since the inception
of our operations through September 30, 2009. Pursuant to
the terms of the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, we will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which we expect to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. We have
no product revenues to date and, other than
Fanapttm
in the United States, have no products or partnered products
approved for sale. Since we began our operations in March 2003,
we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the
in-licensing and clinical development of our products. Our
ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability largely
depends on Novartis ability to successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and to successfully develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
in Canada and upon our ability, alone or with others, to
complete the development of our products or product candidates,
and to obtain the regulatory approvals for and manufacture,
market and sell our products, product candidates and partnered
products. The results of our operations will vary significantly
from
year-to-year
and
quarter-to-quarter
and depend on a
24
number of factors, including risks related to our business,
risks related to our industry, and other risks which are
detailed in Item 1A of Part II of this quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q,
entitled Risk Factors.
Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working
capital throughout 2009 and beyond. We are currently
concentrating our efforts on the transition of the
commercialization and development rights to
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada to Novartis and expect to work with
Novartis, including exchanging information via the joint
steering committee established pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, to assist Novartis
anticipated commercial launch of
Fanapttm
in the first quarter of 2010. The transition includes all
regulatory, manufacturing and certain post-marketing commitments
requested by the FDA. Under the terms of the amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, except for two
post-approval studies we started prior to the execution date of
the amended and restated sublicense agreement, which we are
obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for the
further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a depot formulation of
Fanapttm.
We will also continue to work closely with the FDA on the path
forward for tasimelteon. We expect to continue to operate on a
reduced spending plan with our fixed overhead costs expected to
be approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million per
quarter.
Fanapttm. We
have developed
Fanapttm,
and will continue to develop it outside the U.S. and
Canada, to treat schizophrenia. We submitted an NDA for
Fanapttm
for the treatment of schizophrenia to the FDA on
September 27, 2007 and on November 27, 2007, the FDA
accepted the NDA. The application included data from 35 clinical
trials and more than 3,000 patients treated with
Fanapttm
and also contained pharmacogenetic data aimed to further improve
the benefit/risk profile of
Fanapttm
in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. On May 6,
2009, we announced that the FDA had approved the NDA for
Fanapttm.
On October 12, 2009, we entered into an amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis relating to
Fanapttm.
We had originally entered into a sublicense agreement with
Novartis on June 4, 2004 pursuant to which we obtained
certain worldwide exclusive licenses from Novartis relating to
Fanapttm.
The amended and restated sublicense agreement is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act, which
is expected by the end of 2009. Pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, Novartis will have exclusive
commercialization rights to all formulations of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Except for two post-approval
studies started by us prior to the execution date of the amended
and restated sublicense agreement, which we are obligated to
complete, Novartis will be responsible for the further clinical
development activities in the U.S. and Canada, including
the development of a long-acting injectable (or depot)
formulation of
Fanapttm.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated sublicense
agreement, we will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which we expect to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. We will
be eligible for additional payments totaling up to
$265.0 million upon the achievement of certain commercial
and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We will also receive royalties,
which, as a percentage of net sales, are in the low
double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, we will no longer be
required to make any future milestone payments with respect to
sales of
Fanapttm
or any future royalty payments with respect to sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We retain exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada and we will have exclusive
rights to use any of Novartis data for
Fanapttm
for developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. At Novartis option, we
will enter into good faith discussions with Novartis relating to
the co-commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada or, alternatively, Novartis
will receive a royalty on net sales of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada.
From inception to September 30, 2009 we incurred
approximately $83.0 million in research and development
costs directly attributable to our development of
Fanapttm,
including a $5.0 million milestone payment paid to Novartis
in 2007 upon the acceptance of the NDA. As a result of the
FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
we met an additional milestone under the original sublicense
agreement which required us to make a license payment of
$12.0 million to Novartis. The $12.0 million was
capitalized and will be amortized over the remaining life of the
U.S. patent for
Fanapttm.
Of the $12.0 million milestone payment, $7.0 million
was paid in May 2009 and the remaining $5.0 million was
paid in October 2009.
Tasimelteon. Tasimelteon is our product under
development to treat sleep and mood disorders. Tasimelteon is a
melatonin receptor agonist that works by adjusting the human
body clock of circadian
25
rhythm. Tasimelteon has successfully completed a Phase III
trial for the treatment of transient insomnia in November 2006.
In June 2008, we announced positive top-line results from the
Phase III trial of tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia.
The trial was a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled
study with 324 patients. The trial measured time to fall
asleep and sleep maintenance, as well as
next-day
performance. In addition, we believe that tasimelteon may be
effective in the treatment of insomnia caused by jet lag. We met
with the FDA in June 2009 in an end of Phase II meeting to
discuss this potential jet lag indication. We will continue to
work with the FDA to characterize the path to an NDA for
tasimelteon. Tasimelteon is also ready for Phase II trials
for the treatment of depression.
From inception to September 30, 2009, we incurred
approximately $53.1 million in direct research and
development costs directly attributable to our development of
tasimelteon, including a $1.0 million milestone license fee
paid to BMS in 2006 upon the initiation of our Phase III
program.
VSF-173. On November 3, 2008, we received
written notice from Novartis that our license agreement with
respect to VSF-173 had terminated in accordance with its terms
as a result of our failure to satisfy a specific development
milestone within the time period specified in the license
agreement. As a result, we no longer have any rights with
respect to VSF-173 and Novartis has a non-exclusive worldwide
license to all information and intellectual property generated
by us or on our behalf related to our development of VSF-173. We
are currently evaluating any options that we may have with
respect to VSF-173, which may include the possibility of
entering into a new license agreement or other arrangement with
Novartis to allow us to resume our development of VSF-173;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter
into such an agreement or arrangement on acceptable terms, or at
all.
From inception to September 30, 2009, we incurred
approximately $6.7 million in research and development
costs directly attributable to our development of VSF-173,
including a milestone license fee of $1.0 million paid to
Novartis upon the initiation of our first Phase II clinical
trial in March of 2007.
Research
and development expenses
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of fees
paid to third-party professional service providers in connection
with the services they provide for our clinical trials, costs of
contract manufacturing services, costs of materials used in
clinical trials and research and development, costs for
regulatory consultants and filings, depreciation of capital
resources used to develop our products, all related facilities
costs, and salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation
expenses related to our research and development personnel. We
expense research and development costs as incurred for compounds
in development stage, including certain payments made under our
license agreements prior to obtaining FDA approval. We believe
that significant investment in product development is a
competitive necessity and plan to continue these investments in
order to realize the potential of our products and
pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise. From inception
through September 30, 2009 we incurred research and
development expenses in the aggregate of approximately
$161.2 million, including stock-based compensation expenses
of approximately $9.1 million. We expect to incur licensing
costs in the future that could be substantial, as we continue
our efforts to develop our products, product candidates and
partnered products and to evaluate potential in-license products
or compounds.
The following table summarizes our product development
initiatives for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from
March 13, 2003 (inception) to September 30, 2009.
Included in this table are the research and development expenses
recognized in connection with our products
26
in clinical development. Included in Other product
candidates are the costs directly related to research
initiatives for all other product candidates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Direct project costs(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fanapttm
|
|
$
|
977,000
|
|
|
$
|
993,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,444,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,410,000
|
|
|
$
|
82,973,000
|
|
Tasimelteon
|
|
|
685,000
|
|
|
|
1,513,000
|
|
|
|
1,797,000
|
|
|
|
11,277,000
|
|
|
|
53,107,000
|
|
VSF-173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774,000
|
|
|
|
6,711,000
|
|
Other product candidates
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
355,000
|
|
|
|
101,000
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
6,672,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct product costs
|
|
|
1,686,000
|
|
|
|
3,077,000
|
|
|
|
10,342,000
|
|
|
|
18,761,000
|
|
|
|
149,463,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect project costs(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
153,000
|
|
|
|
163,000
|
|
|
|
465,000
|
|
|
|
532,000
|
|
|
|
2,727,000
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
84,000
|
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
262,000
|
|
|
|
2,195,000
|
|
Other indirect overhead
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
|
|
468,000
|
|
|
|
635,000
|
|
|
|
821,000
|
|
|
|
6,821,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indirect expenses
|
|
|
406,000
|
|
|
|
715,000
|
|
|
|
1,279,000
|
|
|
|
1,615,000
|
|
|
|
11,743,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
2,092,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,792,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,621,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,376,000
|
|
|
$
|
161,206,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Many of our research and development costs are not attributable
to any individual project because we share resources across
several development projects. We record direct costs, including
personnel costs and related benefits and stock-based
compensation, on a
project-by-project
basis. We record indirect costs that support a number of our
research and development activities in the aggregate. |
General
and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and other related costs for personnel, including
stock-based compensation, serving executive, finance,
accounting, information technology, marketing and human resource
functions. Other costs include facility costs not otherwise
included in research and development expenses and fees for
legal, accounting and other professional services. From
inception through September 30, 2009, we incurred general
and administrative expenses in the aggregate of approximately
$100.4 million, including stock-based compensation expenses
of approximately $43.4 million.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
our financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and
expenses during the reported periods. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other factors that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
value of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes
to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008 included in our annual report on
Form 10-K/A.
However, we believe that the following critical accounting
policies are important to understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results, and we have accordingly included
them in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
27
Inventory
We value our inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable
value. We analyze our inventory levels quarterly and write down
inventory that has become obsolete, or has a cost basis in
excess of its expected net realizable value and inventory
quantities in excess of expected requirements. Expired inventory
is disposed of and the related costs are written off to cost of
sales. Prior to FDA approval, all
Fanapttm
manufacturing-related costs were included in research and
development expenses. Subsequent to FDA approval of
Fanapttm,
manufacturing costs related to this product are capitalized.
Intangible
asset, net
Costs incurred for product candidates not yet approved by the
FDA and for which no alternative future use exists are recorded
as expense. In the event a product candidate has been approved
by the FDA or an alternative future use exists for a product
candidate, patent and license costs are capitalized and
amortized over the expected patent life of the related product
candidate. Milestone payments to the Companys
collaborators are recognized when it is deemed probable that the
milestone event will occur.
As a result of the FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
we met a milestone under our original sublicense agreement with
Novartis which required us to make a payment of
$12.0 million to Novartis. Of the $12.0 million
milestone payment, $7.0 million was paid in May 2009 and
the remaining $5.0 million was paid in October 2009. The
$12.0 million is being amortized on a straight line basis
over the remaining life of the U.S. patent for
Fanapttm,
which we expect to last until May 15, 2017. This includes
the Hatch-Waxman extension that extends patent protection for
drug compounds for a period of up to five years to compensate
for time spent in development and a six-month pediatric term
extension. This term is our best estimate of the life of the
patent; if, however, the Hatch-Waxman or pediatric extensions
are not granted, the intangible asset will be amortized over a
shorter period. Amortization of the intangible asset is recorded
as a component of cost of goods sold.
The carrying values of intangible assets are periodically
reviewed to determine if the facts and circumstances suggest
that a potential impairment may have occurred. We had no
impairments of our intangible assets for nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Accrued
expenses
As part of the process of preparing financial statements we are
required to estimate accrued expenses. The estimation of accrued
expenses involves identifying services that have been performed
on our behalf, and then estimating the level of service
performed and the associated cost incurred for such services as
of each balance sheet date in the financial statements. Accrued
expenses include professional service fees, such as lawyers and
accountants, contract service fees, such as those under
contracts with clinical monitors, data management organizations
and investigators in conjunction with clinical trials, fees to
contract manufacturers in conjunction with the production of
clinical materials, and fees for marketing and other
commercialization activities. Pursuant to our assessment of the
services that have been performed on clinical trials and other
contracts, we recognize these expenses as the services are
provided. Our assessments include, but are not limited to:
(1) an evaluation by the project manager of the work that
has been completed during the period, (2) measurement of
progress prepared internally
and/or
provided by the third-party service provider, (3) analyses
of data that justify the progress, and
(4) managements judgment. In the event that we do not
identify certain costs that have begun to be incurred or we
under- or over-estimate the level of services performed or the
costs of such services, our reported expenses for such period
would be too low or too high.
Stock-based
compensation
We adopted the FASB guidance on share based payments
January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective transition
method of implementation and adopted the accelerated attribution
method.
We currently use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model
to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination
of the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an
option pricing
28
model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These
variables include the expected stock price volatility over the
expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected
dividends. Expected volatility rates are based on historical
volatility of the common stock of comparable entities and other
factors due to the lack of historic information of our publicly
traded common stock. The expected term of options granted is
based on the transition approach provided by FASB guidance as
the options meet the plain vanilla criteria required
by this method. The risk-free interest rates are based on the
U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the
expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant.
We have not paid dividends to our stockholders since our
inception and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future. The stock-based compensation expense for a period is
also affected by expected forfeiture rate for the respective
option grants. If our estimates of the fair value of these
equity instruments or expected forfeitures are too high or too
low, it would have the effect of overstating or understating
expenses.
Total stock-based compensation expense, related to all of the
Companys stock-based awards, during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was comprised of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
708,000
|
|
|
$
|
505,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,517,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,357,000
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,555,000
|
|
|
|
3,115,000
|
|
|
|
6,803,000
|
|
|
|
10,349,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,263,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,620,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,706,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance on subsequent events which
establishes general standards of accounting for and the
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. Corporate financial statements are considered issued
when they are widely distributed to shareholders and other
financial statement users for general use and
reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP.
Financial statements are considered available to be issued when
they are in a form and format that complies with GAAP. The
guidance provides that companies should recognize in the
financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that
provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the
date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in
the process of preparing financial statements. The
implementation of this new standard did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on accounting standards
codification and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting
principles. The guidance identifies the source of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles used
in the preparation of financial statements. The guidance is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. We have updated our financial statement
disclosures as appropriate upon adoption of this standard in the
third quarter of 2009.
Results
of Operations
We have a limited history of operations. We anticipate that our
results of operations will fluctuate for the foreseeable future
due to several factors, including any possible payments made or
received pursuant to licensing or collaboration agreements,
progress of our research and development efforts, the timing and
outcome of clinical trials and related possible regulatory
approvals and our and our partners ability to successfully
commercialize our products, product candidates and partnered
products. Our limited operating history makes predictions of
future operations difficult or impossible. Since our inception,
we have incurred significant losses. As of September 30,
2009, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage
of approximately $251.6 million. Pursuant to the terms of
the amended and restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, we
will be entitled to an upfront payment of $200.0 million,
which we expect to receive within 30 days after the
effective date of the agreement.
29
Three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to three months
ended September 30, 2008
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses decreased by approximately
$1.7 million, or 44.8%, to approximately $2.1 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
approximately $3.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
The following table discloses the components of research and
development expenses reflecting all of our project expenses for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Direct project costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trials
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
578,000
|
|
Contract research and development, consulting, materials and
other direct costs
|
|
|
512,000
|
|
|
|
857,000
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
|
464,000
|
|
|
|
1,138,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
708,000
|
|
|
|
504,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct costs
|
|
|
1,686,000
|
|
|
|
3,077,000
|
|
Indirect project costs
|
|
|
406,000
|
|
|
|
715,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,092,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,792,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs decreased approximately $1.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of lower
clinical trial costs due to the completion of the Phase III
clinical trial for tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia which
was completed in 2008, combined with lower manufacturing
expenses for
Fanapttm
and tasimelteon as manufacturing costs for
Fanapttm
were capitalized upon its FDA approval on May 6, 2009, as
well as lower salary and benefit expenses netted with increases
in stock based compensation. Clinical trials expense decreased
approximately $576,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008 due to lower clinical trial costs
relating to the Phase III clinical trial for tasimelteon in
chronic primary insomnia which was completed in 2008. Contract
research and development, consulting, materials and other direct
costs decreased approximately $345,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 relative to the three months ended
September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of decreased
manufacturing costs related to
Fanapttm
and tasimelteon as manufacturing costs related to
Fanapttm
are now capitalized. Salaries, benefits and related costs
decreased approximately $674,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 relative to the three months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to our workforce reduction
which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008. Stock-based
compensation expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 increased by approximately $204,000
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 as a
result of the expense generated by options granted to employees
in the second quarter of 2009.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses decreased by approximately
$2.1 million, or 28.8%, to approximately $5.3 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from
approximately $7.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
30
The following table discloses the components of our general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
$
|
408,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,555,000
|
|
|
|
3,116,000
|
|
Marketing, legal, accounting and other professional expenses
|
|
|
1,755,000
|
|
|
|
2,316,000
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
548,000
|
|
|
|
662,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,266,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs decreased by approximately
$898,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to our workforce reduction which occurred in the
fourth quarter of 2008. Stock-based compensation expense
decreased by approximately $561,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008, as a result of the expense generated by
options granted to employees in the second quarter of 2009
netted with the smaller expense generated by the reduced
workforce. Marketing, legal, accounting and other professional
costs decreased by approximately $561,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008 due primarily to reduced commercial
costs related to
Fanapttm.
Other income, net. Interest and other income
in the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $10,000 compared to approximately $323,000 in the
three months ended September 30, 2008. Interest income was
lower for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008, due
to lower average cash balances for the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to nine months
ended September 30, 2008
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses decreased by approximately
$8.8 million, or 43.0%, to approximately $11.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
approximately $20.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
The following table discloses the components of research and
development expenses reflecting all of our project expenses for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Direct project costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trials
|
|
$
|
37,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,775,000
|
|
Contract research and development, consulting, materials and
other direct costs
|
|
|
7,295,000
|
|
|
|
5,277,000
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
|
1,493,000
|
|
|
|
3,352,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,517,000
|
|
|
|
2,357,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct costs
|
|
|
10,342,000
|
|
|
|
18,761,000
|
|
Indirect project costs
|
|
|
1,279,000
|
|
|
|
1,615,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,621,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,376,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs decreased approximately $8.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 primarily as a result of
lower clinical trial expenses relating to tasimelteon. Clinical
trials expense decreased approximately $7.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to our
Phase III
31
clinical trial of tasimelteon in primary insomnia being
completed in 2008. Contract research and development,
consulting, materials and other direct costs increased
approximately $2.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 relative to the nine months ended
September, 2008, primarily as a result of increased consulting
fees including a $5.2 million Success Fee due to our
regulatory consultants upon approval of
Fanapttm
by the FDA in conjunction with lower manufacturing costs related
to
Fanapttm
and tasimelteon. Salaries, benefits and related costs decreased
approximately $1.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 relative to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to our workforce reduction
which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008. Stock-based
compensation expense decreased by approximately $840,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the expense
generated by options granted to employees in the second quarter
of 2009 netted with the smaller expense generated by the reduced
workforce.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses decreased by approximately
$10.3 million, or 41.7% to approximately $14.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from
approximately $24.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
The following table discloses the components of our general and
administrative expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
$
|
1,376,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,394,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
6,802,000
|
|
|
|
10,349,000
|
|
Marketing, legal, accounting and other professional services
|
|
|
4,586,000
|
|
|
|
8,834,000
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,715,000
|
|
|
|
2,237,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,479,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,814,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs decreased by approximately
$2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to our workforce reduction which occurred in the
fourth quarter of 2008. Stock-based compensation expense
decreased by approximately $3.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as a result of the expense generated by
options granted to employees in the second quarter of 2009
netted with the smaller expense generated by the reduced
workforce. Marketing, legal, accounting and other professional
services decreased by approximately $4.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, relative to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, due primarily to reduced
commercial costs related to
Fanapttm.
Other income, net. Interest and other income
in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $84,000 compared to approximately
$1.6 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Interest income was lower for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, due to lower average cash balances for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Intangible
Asset, Net
The intangible asset consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Lives
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fanapttm
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
606,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,394,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
606,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,394,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
On May 6, 2009, we announced that the FDA had approved the
NDA for
Fanapttm.
As a result of the FDAs approval of the NDA, we met a
milestone under our original sublicense agreement with Novartis
which required us to make a payment of $12.0 million to
Novartis. Of the $12.0 million milestone payment,
$7.0 million was paid in May 2009 and the remaining
$5.0 million was paid in October 2009. The
$12.0 million was capitalized and will be amortized over
the remaining life of the U.S. patent for
Fanapttm.
We expect the patent for
Fanapttm
to be in effect until May 15, 2017. This includes the
Hatch-Waxman extension that provides patent protection for drug
compounds for a period of up to five years to compensate for
time spent in development and a six-month pediatric term
extension. This term is our best estimate of the life of the
patent; if, however, the Hatch-Waxman or pediatric extensions
are not granted, the intangible asset will be amortized over a
shorter period.
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
economic life using the straight line method. Amortization
expense was approximately $606,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The estimated annual amortization
expense for intangible assets is approximately $1.0 million
in 2009, $1.5 million in 2010, $1.5 million in 2011,
$1.5 million in 2012 and $6.5 million from 2013
through 2017. We capitalized and began amortizing the asset
immediately following the FDA approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm.
Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
439,000
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,319,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory, net
|
|
$
|
1,758,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, Novartis will be obligated to purchase all
Fanapttm
inventory following the effective date of the agreement, subject
to such inventory meeting certain requirements.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have funded our operations through September 30, 2009
principally with the net proceeds from private preferred stock
offerings totaling approximately $62.0 million, with net
proceeds from our April 2006 initial public offering of
approximately $53.3 million and with net proceeds from our
January 2007 follow-on offering of approximately
$111.3 million.
As of September 30, 2009, our total cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities were approximately
$20.7 million compared to approximately $46.5 million
at December 31, 2008. Our cash and cash equivalents are
deposits in operating accounts and highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of 90 days or less at date of
purchase and consist of time deposits, investments in money
market funds with commercial banks and financial institutions,
and commercial paper of high-quality corporate issuers. As of
September 30, 2009, we also held a non-current deposit of
$430,000 that is used to collateralize a letter of credit issued
for our current office lease expiring in 2016.
33
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our
liquidity resources are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,418,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,079,000
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,252,000
|
|
U.S. asset-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, short-term
|
|
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
|
7,379,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,683,000
|
|
|
$
|
46,458,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
$
|
430,000
|
|
|
$
|
430,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we maintained all of our cash,
cash equivalents and marketable securities in three financial
institutions. Deposits held with these institutions may exceed
the amount of insurance provided on such deposits, but we do not
anticipate any losses with respect to such deposits.
In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance on fair value
measurements which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB agreed to delay the effective date of this guidance for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. We have adopted the provisions of the
guidance as of January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2009,
for financial instruments and non financial instruments,
respectively. Although the adoption of this guidance did not
materially impact our financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flow, we are now required to provide
additional disclosures as part of our financial statements.
FASB guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These
tiers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets
|
|
|
|
Level 2 defined as inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions
|
As September 30, 2009, we held certain assets that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. We
make use of observable market-based inputs to calculate fair
value, in which case the measurements are classified within
Level 2. We currently do not have non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at
fair value on a recurring basis.
The following is a summary of our assets that are required to be
measured at fair value as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The following is a summary of our assets that are required to be
measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
7,379,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,379,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,379,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,379,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working
capital throughout 2009 and beyond. Pursuant to our amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, we will be entitled
to an upfront payment of $200.0 million, which we expect to
receive within 30 days after the effective date of the
agreement. We are currently concentrating our efforts on the
transition of the commercialization and development rights to
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada to Novartis and expect to work with
Novartis, including exchanging information via the joint
steering committee established pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, to assist Novartis
anticipated commercial launch of
Fanapttm
in the first quarter of 2010. The transition includes all
regulatory, manufacturing and certain post-marketing commitments
requested by the FDA. Under the terms of the amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, except for two
post-approval studies we started prior to the execution date of
the amended and restated sublicense agreement, which we are
obligated to complete, Novartis will be responsible for the
further clinical development activities in the U.S. and
Canada, including the development of a depot formulation of
Fanapttm.
We will also continue to work closely with the FDA on the path
forward for tasimelteon. We expect to continue to operate on a
reduced spending plan with our fixed overhead costs expected to
be approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million per
quarter.
Cash
Flow
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and September 30,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(19,956,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,506,000
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(2,989,000
|
)
|
|
|
39,998,000
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
1,284,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate effect on cash and equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(21,661,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(491,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operations was approximately $20.0 million
and approximately $40.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net loss for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of approximately
$26.6 million was offset by increases in prepaid expenses
and advances of $1.3 million, increases in inventory of
$1.8 million, $9.8 million in non-cash depreciation,
amortization, and stock-based compensation expenses, and
$100,000 changes in net working capital outflows. Net cash used
in investing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was approximately $3.0 million and
consisted primarily of net maturities of marketable securities
of $4.0 million netted with a $7.0 million milestone
payment to Novartis. There was $1.3 million provided by
financing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from the exercise of employee stock
options.
35
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual cash
obligations as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
$
|
216,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
5,159,000
|
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
706,000
|
|
|
|
727,000
|
|
|
|
749,000
|
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
2,035,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,388,000
|
|
|
$
|
387,000
|
|
|
$
|
719,000
|
|
|
$
|
727,000
|
|
|
$
|
749,000
|
|
|
$
|
771,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,035,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
payments
On December 16, 2008, we committed to a plan of termination
that resulted in a work force reduction of 17 employees,
including two officers, in order to reduce operating costs. We
commenced notification of employees affected by the workforce
reduction on December 17, 2008.
The following table summarizes the activity in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 for the liability for the cash
portion of severance costs related to the
reductions-in-force:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Cash Paid
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
Workforce Reduction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research Development
|
|
$
|
571,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
484,000
|
|
|
$
|
87,000
|
|
General & Administrative
|
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899,000
|
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,612,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,000
|
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
Our commitments under operating leases shown above consist of
payments relating to our real estate leases for our current
headquarters located in Rockville, Maryland, expiring in 2016.
Consulting
fees
We had engaged a regulatory consultant to us assist in our
efforts to obtain FDA approval of the
Fanapttm
NDA. We had committed to initial consulting expenses in the
aggregate amount of $2.0 million pursuant to this
engagement, which was expensed in 2008. In addition, we retained
the services of the consultant on a monthly basis at a retainer
fee of $250,000 per month effective as of January 1, 2009.
We became obligated to pay the consultant a success fee of
$6.0 million as a result of the approval by the FDA of the
NDA for
Fanapttm
which was fully expensed in May 2009 and, was offset by the
aggregate amount of all monthly retainer fees previously paid to
the consultant (Success Fee). Through September 30, 2009,
we paid $5.0 million to the consultant. The Success Fee paid in
monthly $1.0 million increments, with the last payment
occurring in October 1, 2009. In addition to these fees, we
reimbursed the consultant for its ordinary and necessary
business expenses incurred in connection with its engagement.
We also engaged financial advisors and consultants to act as our
strategic advisors in connection with a proposed transaction or
partnership involving the possible sale, partnership, or other
business combination of the Company. Pursuant to agreements with
such strategic advisors, we are obligated to pay an aggregate
success fee of approximately $3.5 million following the
effective date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement
with Novartis, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009.
Clinical
research organization contracts and other
contracts
We have entered into agreements with clinical research
organizations responsible for conducting and monitoring our
clinical trials for
Fanapttm
and tasimelteon, and have also entered into agreements with
clinical supply manufacturing organizations and other outside
contractors who will be responsible for additional services
supporting our ongoing clinical development processes. These
contractual obligations are not reflected in the
36
table above because we may terminate them on no more than
60 days notice without incurring additional charges (other
than charges for work completed but not paid for through the
effective date of termination and other costs incurred by our
contractors in closing out work in progress as of the effective
date of termination).
We are currently committed to $5.7 million in outstanding
manufacturing purchase orders for the commercial supply of
Fanapttm.
These commitments will be assumed by Novartis upon the effective
date of the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009.
Pursuant to the amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, we are obligated to continue work on two post-approval
studies which we started prior to the execution date of such
agreement. The cash obligation with respect to these two studies
is approximately $728,000.
License
agreements
In February 2004 and June 2004, we entered into separate
licensing agreements with BMS and Novartis, respectively, for
the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize tasimelteon
and
Fanapttm.
On October 12, 2009, we entered into an amended and
restated sublicense agreement with Novartis which is subject to,
and will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act. We
are obligated to make (in the case of tasimelteon and, in the
case of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada, are entitled to receive) payments
under the conditions in the agreements upon the achievement of
specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones. If the
products are successfully commercialized we will be required to
pay certain royalties (and in the case of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada, will be entitled to receive) based
on net sales for each of the licensed products. Please see the
notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
included with this report for a more detailed description of
these license agreements.
As a result of the successful commencement of the Phase III
clinical study of tasimelteon in March 2006, we met the first
milestone specified in our licensing agreement with BMS and
subsequently paid a license fee of $1.0 million.
As a result of the acceptance by FDA of the NDA for
Fanapttm
in October 2007, we met a milestone under our original
sublicense agreement with Novartis and subsequently paid a
$5.0 million milestone fee. No amounts were recorded as
liabilities relating to the license agreements included in the
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008,
since the amounts, timing and likelihood of these payments are
unknown and will depend on the successful outcome of future
clinical trials, regulatory filings, favorable regulatory
approvals, growth in product sales and other factors. As a
result of the FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm,
we met an additional milestone under the original sublicense
agreement with Novartis which required us to make a payment of
$12.0 million to Novartis. Of the $12.0 million
milestone payment, $7.0 million was paid in May 2009 and
the remaining $5.0 million was paid in October 2009.
The amended and restated sublicense agreement is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act, which
is expected by the end of 2009. Pursuant to the amended and
restated sublicense agreement, Novartis will have exclusive
commercialization rights to all formulations of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Except for two post-approval
studies started by us prior to the execution date of the amended
and restated sublicense agreement, which we are obligated to
complete, Novartis will be responsible for the further clinical
development activities in the U.S. and Canada, including
the development of a long-acting injectable (or depot)
formulation of
Fanapttm.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated sublicense
agreement, we will be entitled to an upfront payment of
$200.0 million, which we expect to receive within
30 days after the effective date of the agreement. We will
be eligible for additional payments totaling up to
$265.0 million upon the achievement of certain commercial
and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We will also receive royalties,
which, as a percentage of net sales, are in the low
double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, we will no longer be
required to make any future milestone payments with respect to
sales of
Fanapttm
or any royalty payments with respect to sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We retain exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada and we will have exclusive
rights to use any of Novartis data for
Fanapttm
for developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. At Novartis option, we
will enter into good faith discussions with Novartis relating to
the co-commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada or, alternatively, Novartis
will receive a royalty on net sales of
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada.
37
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
Interest
Rates
Our exposure to market risk is currently confined to our cash
and cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash.
We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. We have not
used derivative financial instruments for speculation or trading
purposes. Because of the short-term maturities of our cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities, we do not believe
that an increase in market rates would have any significant
impact on the realized value of our investments.
Effects
of Inflation
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities. Because of their liquidity, these assets
are not directly affected by inflation. We also believe that we
have intangible assets in the value of our intellectual
property. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, we have not capitalized the value of this
intellectual property on our balance sheet. Due to the nature of
this intellectual property, we believe that these intangible
assets are not affected by inflation. Because we intend to
retain and continue to use our equipment, furniture and fixtures
and leasehold improvements, we believe that the incremental
inflation related to replacement costs of such items will not
materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation
affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation
and contract services, which could increase our level of
expenses and the rate at which we use our resources.
Marketable
securities
We deposit our cash with financial institutions that we consider
to be of high credit quality and purchase marketable securities
which are generally investment grade, liquid, short-term fixed
income securities and money-market instruments denominated in
U.S. dollars.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in
Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions
Regulation S-K.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2009. Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2009, the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report, to ensure
that the information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the Exchange Act) during the third quarter of 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. In
December 2008, we executed a work force reduction which included
our active Chief Financial Officer. We executed changes to our
key controls to mitigate segregation of duties issues related to
a reduced accounting and finance department. However, the
changes did not materially affect internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2009.
38
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
None.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties
described below, together with all of the other information in
this report and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, including the
consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing herein and therein, with respect to any investment in
shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and future prospects would likely be materially and
adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our
common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Risks
related to our business and industry
We
expect Novartis to begin selling, marketing and distributing our
first approved product,
Fanapttm,
in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2010 and we will depend
heavily on the success of this product in the
marketplace.
Our ability to generate product revenue for the next few years
will depend substantially on the success of
Fanapttm
and the sales of this product by Novartis in the U.S. and
Canada. The ability of
Fanapttm
to generate revenue at the levels we expect will depend on many
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of patients to be able to afford
Fanapttm
or obtain health care coverage that covers
Fanapttm
in the current uncertain economic climate
|
|
|
|
acceptance of, and ongoing satisfaction, with
Fanapttm
by the medical community, patients receiving therapy and third
party payers
|
|
|
|
a satisfactory efficacy and safety profile as demonstrated in a
broad patient population
|
|
|
|
the size of the market for
Fanapttm
|
|
|
|
successfully expanding and sustaining manufacturing capacity to
meet demand
|
|
|
|
cost and availability of raw materials
|
|
|
|
the extent and effectiveness of the sales and marketing and
distribution support
Fanapttm
receives
|
|
|
|
safety concerns in the marketplace for schizophrenia therapies
generally
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments relating to the manufacture or continued
use of
Fanapttm
|
|
|
|
decisions as to the timing of product launches, pricing and
discounts
|
|
|
|
the competitive landscape for approved and developing therapies
that will compete with
Fanapttm
|
|
|
|
Novartis ability to successfully develop and commercialize
a long acting injectable (or depot) formulation of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
|
Novartis ability to expand the indications for which
Fanapttm
can be marketed in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
Novartis ability to obtain regulatory approval in Canada
for
Fanapttm
and our ability to obtain regulatory approval for
Fanapttm
in countries outside the U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully develop and commercialize
Fanapttm,
including a long acting injectable (or depot)
formulation of
Fanapttm,
outside of the U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
|
the unfavorable outcome of any potential litigation relating to
Fanapttm
|
39
We have entered into an amended and restated sublicense
agreement with Novartis to commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada and to further develop and
commercialize a long-acting injectable (or depot) formulation of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. As such, we will not be involved in
the marketing or sales efforts for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Our future revenues depend
substantially on royalties and milestone payments we may receive
from Novartis. Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated
sublicense agreement with Novartis, which is subject to, and
will become effective upon, clearance under the HSR Act, we will
be entitled to an upfront payment of $200.0 million, which
we expect to receive within 30 days after the effective
date of the agreement. We will be eligible for additional
payments totaling up to $265.0 million upon Novartis
achievement of certain commercial and development milestones for
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada, which may or may not be achieved or
met. We will also receive royalties, which, as a percentage of
net sales, are in the low double-digits, on net sales of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. Such royalties may not be
significant and will depend on numerous factors. We cannot
control the amount and timing of resources that Novartis may
devote to
Fanapttm
or the depot formulation of
Fanapttm.
If Novartis fails to successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S., fails to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
in Canada or further develop a long-acting injectable (or depot)
formulation of
Fanapttm,
if Novartis efforts are not effective, or if Novartis
focuses its efforts on other schizophrenia therapies or
schizophrenia drug candidates, our business will be negatively
affected. If Novartis does not successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S. or Canada, we will receive limited revenues
from them.
Although we have developed and continue to develop additional
products and product candidates for commercial introduction, we
expect to be substantially dependent on sales from
Fanapttm
for the foreseeable future. For reasons outside of our control,
including those mentioned above, sales of
Fanapttm
may not meet our expectations. Any significant negative
developments relating to
Fanapttm,
such as safety or efficacy issues, the introduction or greater
acceptance of competing products or adverse regulatory or
legislative developments, will have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations.
If our
products or partnered products are determined to be unsafe or
ineffective in humans, whether commercially or in clinical
trials, our business will be materially harmed.
Despite the FDAs approval of the NDA for
Fanapttm
and the positive results of our completed trials for
Fanapttm
and tasimelteon, we are uncertain whether either of these
products will ultimately prove to be effective and safe in
humans. Frequently, products that have shown promising results
in clinical trials have suffered significant setbacks in later
clinical trials or even after they are approved for commercial
sale. Future uses of our products or our partnered products,
whether in clinical trials or commercially, may reveal that the
product is ineffective, unacceptably toxic, has other
undesirable side effects, is difficult to manufacture on a large
scale, is uneconomical, infringes on proprietary rights of
another party or is otherwise not fit for further use. If our
products or partnered products are determined to be unsafe or
ineffective in humans, our business will be materially harmed.
Clinical
trials for our products, product candidates and partnered
products are expensive and their outcomes are uncertain. Any
failure or delay in completing clinical trials for our products,
product candidates or partnered products could severely harm our
business.
Pre-clinical studies and clinical trials required to demonstrate
the safety and efficacy of our products, product candidates or
partnered products are time-consuming and expensive and together
take several years to complete. Before obtaining regulatory
approvals for the commercial sale of any products or product
candidates, we or our partners must demonstrate through
preclinical testing and clinical trials that such product or
product candidate is safe and effective for use in humans. We
have incurred, and we will continue to incur, substantial
expense for, and devote a significant amount of time to,
preclinical testing and clinical trials.
Historically, the results from preclinical testing and early
clinical trials often have not predicted results of later
clinical trials. A number of new drugs have shown promising
results in clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish
sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals. Clinical trials conducted by us, by our
partners or by third parties on our or our partners behalf
may not demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to obtain the
requisite regulatory approvals for our products, product
candidates
40
or our partnered products. Regulatory authorities may not permit
us or our partners to undertake any additional clinical trials
for our products, product candidates or partnered product, and
it may be difficult to design efficacy studies for products or
product candidates in new indications.
Clinical development efforts performed by us or our partners may
not be successfully completed. Completion of clinical trials may
take several years or more. The length of time can vary
substantially with the type, complexity, novelty and intended
use of the product or product candidate. The commencement and
rate of completion of clinical trials for our products, product
candidates and partnered products may be delayed by many
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to manufacture or obtain from third parties
materials sufficient for use in pre-clinical studies and
clinical trials
|
|
|
|
delays in beginning a clinical trial
|
|
|
|
delays in patient enrollment and variability in the number and
types of patients available for clinical trials
|
|
|
|
difficulty in maintaining contact with patients after treatment,
resulting in incomplete data
|
|
|
|
poor effectiveness of products or product candidates during
clinical trials
|
|
|
|
unforeseen safety issues or side effects and
|
|
|
|
governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory
requirements and guidelines
|
If we or our partners fail to complete successfully one or more
clinical trials for our products, product candidates or
partnered products, we or they may not receive the regulatory
approvals needed to market that product or product candidate.
Therefore, any failure or delay in commencing or completing
these clinical trials would harm our business materially.
We and
our partners face heavy government regulation. FDA regulatory
approval of products, product candidates or partnered products
is uncertain and we and our partners are continually at risk of
the FDA requiring us or them to discontinue marketing any
products that have obtained, or in the future may obtain,
regulatory approval.
The research, testing, manufacturing and marketing of products
such as those that we have developed or we or in regard to
partnered products, our partners, are developing are subject to
extensive regulation by federal, state and local government
authorities, including the FDA. To obtain regulatory approval of
such products, we or our partners must demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the applicable regulatory agency that, among
other things, the product is safe and effective for its intended
use. In addition, we or our partners must show that the
manufacturing facilities used to produce such products are in
compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations
or cGMP.
The process of obtaining FDA and other required regulatory
approvals and clearances can take many years and will require us
and, in the case of partnered products, our partners to expend
substantial time and capital. Despite the time and expense
expended, regulatory approval is never guaranteed. The number of
pre-clinical and clinical trials that will be required for FDA
approval varies depending on the product or product candidate,
the disease or condition that the product or product candidate
is in development for, and the requirements applicable to that
particular product or product candidate. The FDA can delay,
limit or deny approval of a product, product candidate or
partnered product for many reasons, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
a product or product candidate may not be shown to be safe or
effective
|
|
|
|
the FDA may interpret data from pre-clinical and clinical trials
in different ways than we do
|
|
|
|
the FDA may not approve our or our partners manufacturing
processes or facilities
|
|
|
|
a product or product candidate may not be approved for all the
indications we or our partners request
|
|
|
|
the FDA may change its approval policies or adopt new regulations
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
the FDA may not meet, or may extend, the Prescription Drug User
Fee Act (PDUFA) date with respect to a particular NDA and
|
|
|
|
the FDA may not agree with our or our partners regulatory
approval strategies or components of the regulatory filings,
such as clinical trial designs
|
For example, if certain of our or our partners methods for
analyzing trial data are not accepted by the FDA, we or our
partners may fail to obtain regulatory approval for our
products, product candidates or partnered products.
Moreover, the marketing, distribution and manufacture of
approved products remain subject to extensive ongoing regulatory
requirements. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements could result in, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
warning letters
|
|
|
|
fines
|
|
|
|
civil penalties
|
|
|
|
injunctions
|
|
|
|
recall or seizure of products
|
|
|
|
total or partial suspension of production
|
|
|
|
refusal of the government to grant future approvals
|
|
|
|
withdrawal of approvals and
|
|
|
|
criminal prosecution
|
Any delay or failure to obtain regulatory approvals for our
products, product candidates or partnered products will result
in increased costs, could diminish competitive advantages that
we may attain and would adversely affect the marketing of our
products. Other than
Fanapttm
in the U.S., which will be marketed and sold by Novartis, we
have not received regulatory approval to market any product in
any jurisdiction.
Even following regulatory approval of our or our partnered
products, the FDA may impose limitations on the indicated uses
for which such products may be marketed, subsequently withdraw
approval or take other actions against us, our partners or such
products that are adverse to our business. The FDA generally
approves products for particular indications. An approval for a
more limited indication reduces the size of the potential market
for the product. Product approvals, once granted, may be
withdrawn if problems occur after initial marketing.
We and our partners also are subject to numerous federal, state
and local laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe
working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the
environment and the use and disposal of hazardous substances
used in connection with discovery, research and development
work. In addition, we cannot predict the extent to which new
governmental regulations might significantly impede the
discovery, development, production and marketing of our or our
partnered products. We or our partners may be required to incur
significant costs to comply with current or future laws or
regulations, and we may be adversely affected by the cost of
such compliance.
We
intend to seek regulatory approvals for our products, product
candidates and partnered products in foreign jurisdictions, but
we may not obtain any such approvals.
Pursuant to our amended and restated sublicense agreement with
Novartis, we retained the right to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada. We intend to market our
products and partnered products outside the U.S. and Canada
with one or more commercial partners. In order to market our
products and partnered products in foreign jurisdictions, we may
be required to obtain separate regulatory approvals and to
comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The
approval procedure varies among countries and jurisdictions and
can involve additional trials, and the time required to obtain
approval
42
may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. We have no
experience with obtaining any such foreign approvals.
Additionally, the foreign regulatory approval process may
include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval.
For all of these reasons, we may not obtain foreign regulatory
approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does
not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries
or jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory
authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in
other foreign countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may
not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive
necessary approvals to commercialize our products or partnered
products in any market. The failure to obtain these approvals
could harm our business materially.
Our
products, product candidates or partnered products may cause
undesirable side effects or have other properties that could
delay or prevent their regulatory approval or limit their
marketability.
Undesirable side effects caused by our products, product
candidates or partnered products could interrupt, delay or halt
clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory
approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or
all targeted indications, and in turn prevent us or our partners
from commercializing or continuing the commercialization of such
products and generating revenues from their sale. We and our
partners, as applicable, will continue to assess the side effect
profile of our products, product candidates and partnered
products in our ongoing clinical development program. However,
we cannot predict whether the commercial use of products (or
products or product candidates in development, if and when they
are approved for commercial use) will produce undesirable or
unintended side effects that have not been evident in the use
of, or in clinical trials conducted for, such products (and
product candidates) to date. Additionally, incidents of product
misuse may occur. These events, among others, could result in
product recalls, product liability actions or withdrawals or
additional regulatory controls, all of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
In addition, if after receiving marketing approval of a product,
we, our partners or others later identify undesirable side
effects caused by such product, we or our partners could face
one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling
statements, such as a black box warning or a
contraindication
|
|
|
|
regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product
|
|
|
|
we or our partners may be required to change the way the product
is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change
the labeling of the product and
|
|
|
|
our reputation may suffer
|
Any of these events could prevent us or our partners from
achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected
product or could substantially increase the costs and expenses
of commercializing the product, which in turn could delay or
prevent us from generating significant revenues from its sale.
Even
after we or our partners obtain regulatory approvals of a
product, acceptance of such product in the marketplace is
uncertain and failure to achieve market acceptance will prevent
or delay our ability to generate revenues.
Even after obtaining regulatory approvals for the sale of our
products or partnered products, the commercial success of these
products will depend, among other things, on their acceptance by
physicians, patients, third-party payors and other members of
the medical community as a therapeutic and cost-effective
alternative to competing products and treatments. The degree of
market acceptance of any product will depend on a number of
factors, including the demonstration of its safety and efficacy,
its cost-effectiveness, its potential advantages over other
therapies, the reimbursement policies of government and
third-party payors with respect to such product, our ability to
attract corporate partners, including pharmaceutical companies,
to assist in commercializing our products, receipt of regulatory
clearance of marketing claims for the uses that we or our
partners are developing and the effectiveness of our and our
partners marketing and distribution capabilities. If our
products or partnered products fail to gain market acceptance,
we may be unable to earn sufficient revenue to continue our
business. If our products or partnered products do not become
widely
43
accepted by physicians, patients, third-party payors and other
members of the medical community, it is unlikely that we will
ever become profitable.
If we
fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our research and
development activities and commercialization efforts, we may be
unable to continue operations or we may be forced to share our
rights to commercialize our products with third parties on terms
that may not be attractive to us.
Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working
capital throughout 2009 and beyond. To date, we have relied
almost entirely on external financing to fund our operations.
Such financings have historically involved the sale of common
and preferred stock. As of September 30, 2009, we had cash
of approximately $20.7 million. Pursuant to the terms of
the amended and restated sublicense agreement with Novartis, we
will be entitled to an upfront payment of $200.0 million,
which we expect to receive within 30 days after the
effective date of the agreement. Our long term capital
requirements are expected to depend on many factors, including,
among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of royalty and milestone payments received from our
commercial partners
|
|
|
|
our ability to commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
|
costs of developing sales, marketing and distribution channels
and our ability to sell our products
|
|
|
|
costs involved in establishing manufacturing capabilities for
commercial quantities of our products
|
|
|
|
the number of potential formulations, products and product
candidates in development
|
|
|
|
progress with pre-clinical studies and clinical trials
|
|
|
|
time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory (including FDA)
clearance
|
|
|
|
costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining
and enforcing patent, trademark and other intellectual property
claims
|
|
|
|
competing technological and market developments
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products
|
|
|
|
costs for recruiting and retaining employees and consultants
|
|
|
|
costs for training physicians and
|
|
|
|
legal, accounting, insurance and other professional and business
related costs
|
We expect to receive royalty payments and hope to receive
milestone payments relating to
Fanapttm
in connection with our amended and restated sublicense agreement
with Novartis. However, if
Fanapttm
is not as commercially successful as we expect and we do not
receive such payments, and given that our current cash on hand
will not fully fund all development costs of our current
products and product candidates, we may need to raise additional
capital to fund our anticipated operating expenses and execute
on our business plans. In our capital-raising efforts, we may
seek to sell debt securities or additional equity securities or
obtain a bank credit facility, or enter into partnerships or
other collaboration agreements. The sale of additional equity or
debt securities, if convertible, could result in dilution to our
stockholders and may also result in a lower price for our common
stock. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased
fixed obligations and could also result in covenants that could
restrict our operations. However, given the current global
economic climate, we may have more difficulty raising funds than
we would during a period of economic stability, and we may not
be able to raise additional funds on acceptable terms, or at
all. If we are unable to secure sufficient capital to fund our
activities, we may not be able to continue operations, or we may
have to enter into partnerships or other collaboration
agreements that could require us to share commercial rights to
our products to a greater extent or at earlier stages in the
drug development process than is currently intended. These
partnerships or collaborations, if consummated prior to
proof-of-efficacy or safety of a given product, could impair our
ability to realize value from that product. If additional
financing is not available when required or is not available on
acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our operations and
planned growth,
44
develop or enhance our technologies or products, take advantage
of business opportunities or respond to competitive market
pressures, any of which would materially harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We
have a history of operating losses, anticipate future losses and
may never become profitable on a sustained basis.
We have a limited operating history. As of September 30,
2009, we have accumulated net losses of approximately
$251.6 million. Our ability to generate revenue and achieve
profitability largely depends on Novartis ability to
successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada and upon our ability, alone or with
others, to complete the development of our products or product
candidates, obtain the regulatory approvals and manufacture,
market and sell our products, product candidates and partnered
products. We and our partners may be unable to achieve these
goals.
Although we have generated some licensing-related and other
revenue to date and expect to receive an upfront payment of
$200.0 million within 30 days after the effective date
of our amended and restated sublicense agreement with Novartis,
we have not generated any revenue from the commercial sale of
products and we cannot estimate with precision the extent of our
future losses. We have been engaged in identifying and
developing compounds since March 2003, which has required, and
will continue to require, significant research and development
expenditures. This relatively limited operating history may not
be adequate to enable you to fully assess our ability to develop
and commercialize our technologies and products, product
candidates or partnered products, obtain FDA or other regulatory
approvals and achieve market acceptance of products, product
candidates or partnered products and respond to competition.
A major component of our revenue for the foreseeable future will
depend on Novartis and our ability to sell
Fanapttm.
Fanapttm
may not be as commercially successful as we expect, Novartis may
not succeed in commercializing
Fanapttm
in the U.S., developing and commercializing
Fanapttm
in Canada and we may not succeed in commercializing
Fanapttm
outside of the U.S. and Canada. In addition, we may not
succeed in commercializing any other products or product
candidates. We cannot assure you that we will be profitable even
if our products or partnered products are successfully
commercialized. We may be unable to fully develop, obtain
regulatory approval for, commercialize, manufacture, market,
sell and derive revenue from our products, product candidates or
partnered products in the timeframes we project, if at all, and
our inability to do so would materially and adversely impact the
market price of our common stock and our ability to raise
capital and continue operations.
There can be no assurance that we will achieve sustained
profitability. Our ability to achieve sustained profitability in
the future depends, in part, upon:
|
|
|
|
|
our and our partners ability to obtain and maintain
regulatory approval for our products, product candidates and
partnered products, both in the U.S. and in foreign
countries
|
|
|
|
Novartis ability to successfully market and sell
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada and achieve certain product
development and sales milestones
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter into agreements to develop and
commercialize our products and product candidates
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop, have manufactured and market our
products and product candidates
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain adequate reimbursement coverage for our
products from insurance companies, government programs and other
third party payors
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional research and development
funding from collaborative partners or funding for our products
and product candidates
|
45
In addition, the amount we spend will impact our profitability.
Our spending will depend, in part, upon:
|
|
|
|
|
the progress of our research and development programs for our
products and product candidates, including clinical trials
|
|
|
|
the time and expense that will be required to pursue FDA
and/or
foreign regulatory approvals for our products and product
candidates and whether such approvals are obtained
|
|
|
|
the time and expense required to prosecute, enforce
and/or
challenge patent and other intellectual property rights
|
|
|
|
the cost of operating and maintaining development and research
facilities
|
|
|
|
the cost of third party manufacturers
|
|
|
|
the number of product candidates we pursue
|
|
|
|
how competing technological and market developments affect our
products and product candidates
|
|
|
|
the cost of possible acquisitions of technologies, compounds,
product rights or companies
|
|
|
|
the cost of obtaining licenses to use technology owned by others
for proprietary products and otherwise
|
|
|
|
the costs of potential litigation and
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with recruiting and compensating a highly
skilled workforce in an environment where competition for such
employees may be intense
|
We may not achieve all or any of these goals and, thus, we
cannot provide assurances that we will ever be profitable on a
sustained basis or achieve significant revenues. Even if we do
achieve some or all of these goals, we may not achieve
significant or sustained commercial success.
If our
contract research organizations do not successfully carry out
their duties or if we lose our relationships with contract
research organizations, our drug development efforts could be
delayed.
Our arrangements with contract research organizations are
critical to our success in bringing our products and product
candidates to the market and promoting such marketed products
profitably. We are dependent on contract research organizations,
third-party vendors and investigators for pre-clinical testing
and clinical trials related to our drug discovery and
development efforts and we will likely continue to depend on
them to assist in our future discovery and development efforts.
These parties are not our employees and we cannot control the
amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs.
As such, they may not complete activities on schedule or may not
conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory
requirements or our stated protocols. The parties with which we
contract for execution of our clinical trials play a significant
role in the conduct of the trials and the subsequent collection
and analysis of data. If they fail to devote sufficient time and
resources to our drug development programs or if their
performance is substandard, it will delay the development,
approval and commercialization of our products and product
candidates. Moreover, these parties may also have relationships
with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with
us. If they assist our competitors, it could harm our
competitive position.
Our contract research organizations could merge with or be
acquired by other companies or experience financial or other
setbacks unrelated to our collaboration that could,
nevertheless, materially adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
If we lose our relationship with any one or more of these
parties, we could experience a significant delay in both
identifying another comparable provider and then contracting for
its services. We may be unable to retain an alternative provider
on reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we locate an alternative
provider, it is likely that this provider may need additional
time to respond to our needs and may not provide the same type
or level of service as the original provider. In addition, any
provider that we retain will be subject to current Good
Laboratory Practices or cGLP, and similar foreign standards and
we do not have control over compliance
46
with these regulations by these providers. Consequently, if
these practices and standards are not adhered to by these
providers, the development and commercialization of our products
could be delayed.
We
rely on a limited number of third party manufacturers to
formulate and manufacture our products, product candidates and
partnered products and our business will be seriously harmed if
these manufacturers are not able to satisfy our demand and
alternative sources are not available.
Our expertise is primarily in the research and development and
pre-clinical and clinical trial phases of product development.
We do not have an in-house manufacturing capability and depend
completely on a small number of third-party manufacturers and
active pharmaceutical ingredient formulators for the manufacture
of our products, product candidates and partnered products.
Therefore, we are dependent on third parties for our formulation
development and manufacturing of our products, product
candidates and partnered products. This may expose us to the
risk of not being able to directly oversee the production and
quality of the manufacturing process and provide ample
commercial supplies to successfully launch and maintain the
marketing of our products. Furthermore, these third party
contractors, whether foreign or domestic, may experience
regulatory compliance difficulty, mechanical shut downs,
employee strikes, or other unforeseeable events that may delay
or limit production. Our inability to adequately establish,
supervise and conduct (either ourselves or through third
parties) all aspects of the formulation and manufacturing
processes would have a material adverse effect on our ability to
develop and commercialize our products, product candidates and
partnered products.
We do not have long-term agreements with any of these third
parties, and if they are unable or unwilling to perform for any
reason, we may not be able to locate alternative acceptable
manufacturers or formulators or enter into favorable agreements
with them. Any inability to acquire sufficient quantities of our
products or partnered products in a timely manner from these
third parties could adversely affect sales of our product, delay
clinical trials and prevent us from developing our products,
product candidates and partnered products in a cost-effective
manner or on a timely basis. In addition, manufacturers of our
products and partnered products are subject to cGMP and similar
foreign standards and we do not have control over compliance
with these regulations by our manufacturers. If one of our
contract manufacturers fails to maintain compliance, the
production of our products or partnered products could be
interrupted, resulting in delays and additional costs. In
addition, if the facilities of such manufacturers do not pass a
pre-approval or post-approval plant inspection, the FDA will not
grant approval and may institute restrictions on the marketing
or sale of our products or partnered products.
Our manufacturing strategy presents the following additional
risks:
|
|
|
|
|
because most of our third-party manufacturers and formulators
are located outside of the U.S., there may be difficulties in
importing our compounds or their components into the
U.S. as a result of, among other things, FDA import
inspections, incomplete or inaccurate import documentation or
defective packaging
|
|
|
|
because of the complex nature of our products and product
candidates, our manufacturers may not be able to successfully
manufacture our products and product candidates in a
cost-effective
and/or
timely manner.
|
Materials
necessary to manufacture our products, product candidates and
partnered products may not be available on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all, which may delay the development,
regulatory approval and commercialization of our
products.
We rely on our manufacturers to purchase from third-party
suppliers the materials necessary to produce our products,
product candidates and partnered products for our clinical
trials and commercialization. Suppliers may not sell these
materials to our manufacturers at the times we need them or on
commercially reasonable terms. We do not have any control over
the process or timing of the acquisition of these materials by
our manufacturers. Moreover, we currently do not have any
agreements for the commercial production of these materials. If
our manufacturers are unable to obtain these materials for our
clinical trials, product testing, potential regulatory approval
of our products, product candidates and partnered products and
commercial scale manufacturing could be delayed, significantly
affecting our ability to further develop and commercialize our
47
products, product candidates and partnered products. If we, our
manufacturers or, in the case of our partnered products, our
partners are unable to purchase these materials for our products
or partnered products, as applicable, there would be a shortage
in supply or the commercial launch of such products would be
delayed, which would materially affect our or our partners
ability to generate revenues from the sale of such products.
We
face substantial competition which may result in others
developing or commercializing products before or more
successfully than we do.
Our future success will depend on our or our partners
ability to demonstrate and maintain a competitive advantage with
respect to our products or partnered products and our ability to
identify and develop additional products or product candidates
through the application of our pharmacogenetics and
pharmacogenomics expertise. Large, fully integrated
pharmaceutical companies, either alone or together with
collaborative partners, have substantially greater financial
resources and have significantly greater experience than we do
in:
|
|
|
|
|
developing products and product candidates
|
|
|
|
undertaking pre-clinical testing and clinical trials
|
|
|
|
obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of products and
product candidates and
|
|
|
|
manufacturing, marketing and selling products
|
These companies may invest heavily and quickly to discover and
develop novel products that could make our products or product
candidates obsolete. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in
obtaining patent protection, receiving FDA approval or
commercializing superior products or other competing products
before we do. Technological developments or the FDAs
approval of new therapeutic indications for existing products
may make our existing products or partnered products, or those
product candidates we are developing, obsolete or may make them
more difficult to market successfully, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Our products, product candidates or partnered products, if
successfully developed and approved for commercial sale, will
compete with a number of drugs and therapies currently
manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical and other
biotechnology companies. Our products, product candidates and
partnered products may also compete with new products currently
under development by others or with products which may cost less
than our products, product candidates or partnered products.
Physicians, patients, third party payors and the medical
community may not accept or utilize any of our products or
partnered products that may be approved. If our products or
partnered products (and our product candidates, if and when
approved) do not achieve significant market acceptance, our
business, results of operations and financial condition would be
materially adversely affected. We believe the primary
competitors for each of our products and partnered products are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
Fanapttm
in the treatment of schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotics
risperidone, including the depot formulation
Risperdal®
Consta®,
and
Invega®
(paliperidone)
Sustenna®
as well as oral
Invega®,
all by Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Zyprexa®
(olanzapine) by Eli Lilly and Company,
Seroquel®
(quetiapine) by AstraZeneca PLC,
Abilify®
(aripiprazole) by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company/Otsuka
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
Geodon®
(ziprasidone) by Pfizer Inc.,
Saphris®
(asenapine) by Merck Schering and generic risperidone and
clozapine, as well as the typical antipsychotics haloperidol,
chlorpromazine, thioridazine, and sulpiride (all of which are
generic). In addition to the approved products, compounds in
Phase III trials (or for which an NDA has been recently
filed) for the treatment of schizophrenia include lurasidone
(Dainippon Sumitomo).
|
|
|
|
For tasimelteon in the treatment of insomnia,
Rozeremtm
(ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, hypnotics
such as
Ambien®
CR (zolpidem) by sanofi-aventis,
Lunesta®
(eszopiclone) by Sepracor Inc. and
Sonata®
(zaleplon) by King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., generic compounds such
as zolpidem, trazodone and doxepin, and over-the-counter
remedies such as
Benadryl®
and Tylenol
PM®.
In addition to the approved products, compounds in
Phase III trials for insomnia (or for which an NDA has been
recently filed) include indiplon (Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.),
low-dose doxepin
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(Silenortm)
by Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Intermezzo®
(zolpidem tartarate sublingual lozenge) by Transcept
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For tasimelteon in the treatment of depression, generic
antidepressants such as paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine and
buproprion,
Lexapro®
(escitalopram) by Lundbeck A/S /Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc., and
Effexor®
(venlafaxine) by Wyeth as well as other compounds such as
Cymbalta®
(duloxetine) by Eli Lilly and Valdoxan (agomelatine) by Novartis
and Les Laboratories Servier.
|
Additionally, our ability to compete may be affected because
insurers and other third-party payors in some cases seek to
encourage the use of cheaper, generic products, which could make
our products or partnered products less attractive.
We
have no experience selling, marketing or distributing products
and no internal capability to do so, which may make
commercializing our products and product candidates
difficult.
At present, we have no marketing experience and sales
capabilities. Therefore, in order for us to commercialize
Fanapttm,
outside the U.S. and Canada, or other products or product
candidates, we must either acquire or internally develop sales,
marketing and distribution capabilities, or enter into
collaborations with partners to perform these services for us.
We may, in some instances, rely significantly on sales,
marketing and distribution arrangements with our collaborative
partners and other third parties. For example, we rely
completely on Novartis to market, sell and distribute
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada and our future revenues are
materially dependent on the success of the efforts of Novartis.
For the commercialization of
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada or our other products or
product candidates, we may not be able to establish sales and
distribution partnerships on acceptable terms or at all, and if
we do enter into a distribution arrangement, our success will be
materially dependent upon the performance of our partner. In the
event that we attempt to acquire or develop our own in-house
sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, factors that may
inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products without
partners or licensees include:
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of
effective sales and marketing personnel
|
|
|
|
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade
adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our products
|
|
|
|
the lack of complementary products to be offered by our sales
personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage
against companies with broader product lines and
|
|
|
|
unforeseen costs associated with creating our own sales and
marketing team or with entering into a partnering agreement with
an independent sales and marketing organization
|
The cost of establishing and maintaining a sales, marketing and
distribution organization may exceed its cost effectiveness. If
we fail to develop sales and marketing capabilities, if sales
efforts are not effective or if costs of developing sales and
marketing capabilities exceed their cost effectiveness, our
business, results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
If we
cannot identify, or enter into licensing arrangements for, new
products or product candidates, our ability to develop a diverse
product portfolio may be limited.
A component of our business strategy is acquiring rights to
develop and commercialize compounds discovered or developed by
other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for which we
may find effective uses and markets through our unique
pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise. Competition for
the acquisition of these compounds is intense. If we are not
able to identify opportunities to acquire rights to
commercialize additional products, we may not be able to develop
a diverse portfolio of products and product candidates and our
business may be harmed. Additionally, it may take substantial
human and financial resources to secure commercial rights to
promising products or product candidates. Moreover, if other
firms develop pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics
capabilities, we may face increased competition in identifying
and acquiring additional products or product candidates.
49
We may
not be successful in the development of products for our own
account.
In addition to our business strategy of acquiring rights to
develop and commercialize products and product candidates, we
may develop products and product candidates for our own account
by applying our technologies to off-patent drugs as well as
developing our own proprietary molecules. Because we will be
funding the development of such programs, there is a risk that
we may not be able to continue to fund all such programs to
completion or to provide the support necessary to perform the
clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals or market any
approved products on a worldwide basis. We expect the
development of products for our own account to consume
substantial resources. If we are able to develop commercial
products on our own, the risks associated with these programs
may be greater than those associated with our programs with
collaborative partners.
If we
lose key scientists or management personnel, or if we fail to
recruit additional highly skilled personnel, it will impair our
ability to identify, develop and commercialize
products.
We are highly dependent on principal members of our management
team and scientific staff, including our Chief Executive
Officer, Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. These executives
each have significant pharmaceutical industry experience. The
loss of any such executives, including Dr. Polymeropoulos,
or any other principal member of our management team or
scientific staff, would impair our ability to identify, develop
and market new products. Our management and other employees may
voluntarily terminate their employment with us at any time. The
loss of the services of these or other key personnel, or the
inability to attract and retain additional qualified personnel,
could result in delays to development or approval, loss of sales
and diversion of management resources. In addition, we depend on
our ability to attract and retain other highly skilled
personnel, including research scientists. Competition for
qualified personnel is intense, and the process of hiring and
integrating such qualified personnel is often lengthy. We may be
unable to recruit such personnel on a timely basis, if at all,
which would negatively impact our development and
commercialization programs.
Additionally, we do not currently maintain key
person life insurance on the lives of our executives or
any of our employees. This lack of insurance means that we may
not have adequate compensation for the loss of the services of
these individuals.
Product
liability lawsuits could divert our resources, result in
substantial liabilities and reduce the commercial potential of
our products or partnered products.
The risk that we may be sued on product liability claims is
inherent in the development and sale of pharmaceutical products.
For example, we face a risk of product liability exposure
related to the testing of our products in clinical trials and
will face even greater risks upon commercialization by us or our
partners of our products and partnered products. We believe that
we may be at a greater risk of product liability claims relative
to other pharmaceutical companies because our products and
partnered products are intended to treat behavioral disorders,
and it is possible that we may be held liable for the behavior
and actions of patients who use our products or partnered
products. These lawsuits may divert our management from pursuing
our business strategy and may be costly to defend. In addition,
if we are held liable in any of these lawsuits, we may incur
substantial liabilities and we or our partners may be forced to
limit or forego further commercialization of one or more of our
products or partnered products. Although we maintain product
liability insurance, our aggregate coverage limit under this
insurance is $5.0 million, and while we believe this amount
of insurance is sufficient to cover our product liability
exposure, these limits may not be high enough to fully cover
potential liabilities. As our development activities and
commercialization efforts progress and we and our partners sell
our products or partnered products, this coverage may be
inadequate, we may be unable to obtain adequate coverage at an
acceptable cost or we may be unable to get adequate coverage at
all or our insurer may disclaim coverage as to a future claim.
This could prevent or limit the commercialization of our product
candidates or commercial sales of our products or partnered
products. Even if we are able to maintain insurance that we
believe is adequate, our results of operations and financial
condition may be materially adversely affected by a product
liability claim. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and
continuation of products liability litigation or other
proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to compete
50
in the marketplace. Product liability litigation and other
related proceedings may also require significant management time.
Legislative
or regulatory reform of the healthcare system in the U.S. and
foreign jurisdictions may affect our or our partners
ability to sell our products or partnered products
profitably.
The continuing efforts of the U.S. and foreign governments,
insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors
of health care services to contain or reduce health care costs
may adversely affect our or our partners ability to set
prices for our products or partnered products which we or our
partners believe are fair, and our ability to generate revenues
and achieve and maintain profitability.
Specifically, in both the U.S. and some foreign
jurisdictions there have been a number of legislative and
regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways
that could affect our or our partners ability to sell our
products or partnered products profitably. In the U.S., the
Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 reforms the way Medicare will cover and provide reimburse
for pharmaceutical products. This legislation could decrease the
coverage and price that we or our partners may receive for our
products or partnered products. Other third-party payors are
increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products
and services. It will be time-consuming and expensive for us or
our partners to go through the process of seeking reimbursement
from Medicare and private payors. Our products or partnered
products may not be considered cost effective, and coverage and
reimbursement may not be available or sufficient to allow the
sale of such products on a competitive and profitable basis.
Further federal and state proposals and healthcare reforms are
likely which could limit the prices that can be charged for the
drugs we develop and may further limit our commercial
opportunity. Our results of operations could be materially
adversely affected by the Medicare prescription drug coverage
legislation, by the possible effect of this legislation on
amounts that private insurers will pay and by other healthcare
reforms that may be enacted or adopted in the future.
In some foreign countries, including major markets in the
European Union and Japan, the pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these
countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities
can take nine to twelve months or longer after the receipt of
regulatory marketing approval for a product. To obtain
reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be
required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the
cost-effectiveness of our product to other available therapies.
Our business could be materially harmed if reimbursement of our
products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount or if
pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels.
Our
business is subject to extensive governmental regulation and
oversight and changes in laws could adversely affect our
revenues and profitability.
Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and
oversight. As a result, we may become subject to governmental
actions which could materially adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
new laws, regulations or judicial decisions, or new
interpretations of existing laws, regulations or decisions,
related to patent protection and enforcement, health care
availability, method of delivery and payment for health care
products and services or our business operations generally
|
|
|
|
changes in the FDA and foreign regulatory approval processes
that may delay or prevent the approval of new products and
result in lost market opportunity
|
|
|
|
new laws, regulations and judicial decisions affecting pricing
or marketing and
|
|
|
|
changes in the tax laws relating to our operations
|
In addition, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
2007 or the FDAAA included new authorization for the FDA to
require post-market safety monitoring, along with a clinical
trials registry, and expanded authority for the FDA to impose
civil monetary penalties on companies that fail to meet certain
commitments. The recently enacted amendments will among other
things, require some new drug applicants to
51
submit risk evaluation and minimization strategies to monitor
and address potential safety issues for products upon approval,
grant the FDA the authority to impose risk management measures
for marketed products and to mandate labeling changes in certain
circumstances, and establish new requirements for disclosing the
results of clinical trials. Companies that violate the new law
are subject to substantial civil monetary penalties. Additional
measures have also been enacted to address the perceived
shortcomings in the FDAs handling of drug safety issues,
and to limit pharmaceutical company sales and promotional
practices. While we expect the FDAAA to have a substantial
effect on the pharmaceutical industry, the extent of that effect
is not yet known. As the FDA issues regulations, guidance and
interpretations relating to the new legislation, the impact on
the industry as well as our business will become clearer. The
new requirements and other changes that the FDAAA imposes may
make it more difficult, and likely more costly, to obtain
approval of new pharmaceutical products and to produce, market
and distribute existing products. Our and our partners
ability to commercialize approved products successfully may be
hindered, and our business may be harmed as a result.
Failure
to comply with government regulations regarding the sale and
marketing of our products or partnered products could harm our
business.
Our and our partners activities, including the sale and
marketing of our products or partnered products, are subject to
extensive government regulation and oversight, including
regulation under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and
other federal and state statutes. We are also subject to the
provisions of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and several
similar state laws, which prohibit payments intended to induce
physicians or others either to purchase or arrange for or
recommend the purchase of healthcare products or services. While
the federal law applies only to products or services for which
payment may be made by a federal healthcare program, state laws
may apply regardless of whether federal funds may be involved.
These laws constrain the sales, marketing and other promotional
activities of manufacturers of drugs and biologicals, such as
us, by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements, including
sales programs, with hospitals, physicians, and other potential
purchasers of drugs and biologicals. Other federal and state
laws generally prohibit individuals or entities from knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from
Medicare, Medicaid, or other third party payors that are false
or fraudulent, or are for items or services that were not
provided as claimed. Anti-kickback and false claims laws
prescribe civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance that
can be substantial, including the possibility of exclusion from
federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid).
Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have been the target
of lawsuits and investigations alleging violations of government
regulation, including claims asserting antitrust violations,
violations of the Federal False Claim Act, the Anti-Kickback
Statute, the Prescription Drug Marketing Act and other
violations in connection with off-label promotion of products
and Medicare
and/or
Medicaid reimbursement or related to environmental matters and
claims under state laws, including state anti-kickback and fraud
laws.
While we continually strive to comply with these complex
requirements, interpretations of the applicability of these laws
to marketing practices are ever evolving. If any such actions
are instituted against us or our partners and we or they are not
successful in defending such actions or asserting our rights,
those actions could have a significant and material impact on
our business, including the imposition of significant fines or
other sanctions. Even an unsuccessful challenge could cause
adverse publicity and be costly to respond to, and thus could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Future
transactions may harm our business or the market price of our
stock.
We regularly review potential transactions related to
technologies, products or product rights and businesses
complementary to our business. These transactions could include:
|
|
|
|
|
mergers
|
|
|
|
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
strategic alliances
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
licensing agreements and
|
|
|
|
co-promotion and similar agreements
|
We may choose to enter into one or more of these transactions at
any time, which may cause substantial fluctuations in the market
price of our stock. Moreover, depending upon the nature of any
transaction, we may experience a charge to earnings, which could
also materially adversely affect our results of operations and
could harm the market price of our stock.
We may
undertake strategic acquisitions in the future, and difficulties
integrating such acquisitions could damage our ability to
sustain profitability.
Although we have no experience in acquiring businesses, we may
acquire businesses that complement or augment our existing
business. If we acquire businesses with promising product
candidates or technologies, we may not be able to realize the
benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to move
one or more products or product candidates through preclinical
and/or
clinical development to regulatory approval and
commercialization. Integrating any newly acquired businesses or
technologies could be expensive and time-consuming, resulting in
the diversion of resources from our current business. We may not
be able to integrate any acquired business successfully. We
cannot assure you that, following an acquisition, we will
achieve revenues, specific net income or loss levels that
justify the acquisition or that the acquisition will result in
increased earnings, or reduced losses, for the combined company
in any future period. Moreover, we may need to raise additional
funds through public or private debt or equity financing to
acquire any businesses, which would result in dilution for
stockholders or the incurrence of indebtedness. We may not be
able to operate acquired businesses profitably or otherwise
implement our growth strategy successfully.
Our
quarterly operating results may fluctuate
significantly.
Our operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly
fluctuations. The revenues we generate, if any, and our
operating results will be affected by numerous factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
our addition or termination of development programs
|
|
|
|
variations in the level of expenses related to our products,
product candidates or future development programs
|
|
|
|
our execution of collaborative, licensing or other arrangements,
and the timing of payments we may make or receive under these
arrangements
|
|
|
|
the timing of royalties or milestone payments, if any, from the
sales of
Fanapttm
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments affecting our products, product
candidates and partnered products or those of our competitors
|
|
|
|
product sales
|
|
|
|
cost of product sales
|
|
|
|
marketing and other expenses and
|
|
|
|
manufacturing or supply issues
|
|
|
|
any intellectual property infringement lawsuit in which we may
become involved
|
If our quarterly operating results fall below the expectations
of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common
stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly
fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the
price of our stock to fluctuate substantially. We believe that
quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not
necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an
indication of our future performance.
53
Risks
related to intellectual property and other legal
matters
Our
rights to develop and commercialize our products, product
candidates and partnered products are subject in part to the
terms and conditions of licenses or sublicenses granted to us by
other pharmaceutical companies. With respect to tasimelteon,
these terms and conditions include an option in favor of the
licensor to reacquire rights to commercialize and develop this
product in certain circumstances.
Fanapttm
(iloperidone) is based in part on patents and other intellectual
property owned by sanofi-aventis and Novartis. Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Titan) holds an exclusive license from
sanofi-aventis to the intellectual property owned by
sanofi-aventis, and Titan has sublicensed its rights under such
license on an exclusive basis to Novartis. We acquired exclusive
rights to this and other intellectual property through a further
sublicense from Novartis. The sublicense with Novartis was
amended and restated in October of 2009 to provide Novartis with
exclusive rights to commercialize
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada and further develop and
commercialize a long acting injectable or depot
formulation of
Fanapttm
in the U.S. and Canada. We retained exclusive rights to
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada, subject to, at Novartis
option, Novartis right to co-commercialize
Fanapttm
and the depot formulation of
Fanapttm
in any country outside the U.S. and Canada on terms to be
agreed to by Novartis and us at such time or to receive a
royalty on sales outside the U.S. and Canada. We may lose
our rights to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada if we fail to comply with
certain requirements in the amended and restated sublicense
agreement regarding our financial condition, or if we fail to
comply with certain diligence obligations regarding our
development activities or if we otherwise breach the amended and
restated sublicense agreement and fail to cure such breach. Our
rights to develop and commercialize
Fanapttm
outside the U.S. and Canada may be impaired if we do not
cure breaches by Novartis of similar obligations contained in
its sublicense agreement with Titan, although we are not aware
of any such breach by Novartis. Our loss of rights in
Fanapttm
to Novartis would have a material adverse effect on our
business. In addition, if Novartis breaches the amended and
restated sublicense agreement with respect to its
commercialization activities in the U.S. or Canada, we may
terminate Novartis commercialization rights in the
applicable country. We would no longer receive royalty payments
from Novartis in connection with such country in the event of
such termination.
Tasimelteon is based in part on patents that we have licensed on
an exclusive basis and other intellectual property licensed from
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS). BMS holds certain rights
with respect to tasimelteon in the license agreement. If we have
not agreed to one or more partnering arrangements to develop and
commercialize tasimelteon in certain significant markets with
one or more third parties after the completion of the
Phase III program, BMS has the option to exclusively
develop and commercialize tasimelteon on its own on
pre-determined financial terms, including milestone and royalty
payments. BMS may terminate our license if we fail to meet
certain milestones or if we otherwise breach our royalty or
other obligations in the agreement. In the event that we
terminate our license, or if BMS terminates our license due to
our breach, all of our rights to tasimelteon (including any
intellectual property we develop with respect to tasimelteon)
will revert back to BMS or otherwise be licensed back to BMS on
an exclusive basis. Any termination or reversion of our rights
to develop or commercialize tasimelteon, including any
reacquisition by BMS of our rights, may have a material adverse
effect on our business.
If our
efforts to protect the proprietary nature of the intellectual
property related to our products, product candidates and
partnered products are not adequate, we may not be able to
compete effectively in our markets.
In addition to the rights we have licensed from Novartis and BMS
relating to our products and partnered products, we rely upon
intellectual property we own relating to these products,
including patents, patent applications and trade secrets. As of
September 30, 2009 we had seven pending provisional patent
applications in the U.S., eight U.S. national stage
applications under U.S.C. 371 and eight pending Patent
Cooperation Treaty applications, which permit the pursuit of
patents outside of the U.S., relating to our products in
clinical development. Our patent applications may be challenged
or fail to result in issued patents and our existing or future
patents may be too narrow to prevent third parties from
developing or designing around these patents. In addition, we
rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements
to protect certain proprietary know-how that is not patentable,
for processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and for
any other
54
elements of our drug development processes that involve
proprietary know-how, information and technology that is not
covered by patent applications. While we require all of our
employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have
access to our proprietary know-how, information and technology
to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain
that this know-how, information and technology will not be
disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to
our trade secrets or independently develop substantially
equivalent information and techniques. Further, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same
extent as the laws of the U.S. As a result, we may
encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our
intellectual property both in the U.S. and abroad. If we
are unable to protect or defend the intellectual property
related to our technologies, we will not be able to establish or
maintain a competitive advantage in our market.
If we
do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Act and similar
foreign legislation to extend our patents and to obtain market
exclusivity for our products, our business will be materially
harmed.
The United States Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984, more commonly known as the
Hatch-Waxman Act, provides for an extension of
patent protection for drug compounds for a period of up to five
years to compensate for time spent in development. Assuming we
gain a five-year extension for tasimelteon, and that we continue
to have rights under our license agreement with respect to this
product, we would have exclusive rights to tasimelteons
U.S. new chemical entity patent (the primary
patent covering the compound as a new composition of matter)
until 2022. During the second quarter of 2009, we submitted to
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office our application to
extend the term of its patent relating to
Fanapttm
under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Assuming we gain a five-year
extension for
Fanapttm,
pursuant to the terms and conditions of our amended and restated
sublicense agreement Novartis would have the benefit of
exclusive rights to
Fanapttms
U.S. new chemical entity patent until 2016. A directive in
the European Union provides that companies who receive
regulatory approval for a new compound will have a
10-year
period of market exclusivity for that compound (with the
possibility of a further one-year extension) in most countries
in Europe, beginning on the date of such European regulatory
approval, regardless of when the European new chemical entity
patent covering such compound expires. A generic version of the
approved drug may not be marketed or sold in Europe during such
market exclusivity period. This directive may be of particular
importance with respect to
Fanapttm,
since the European new chemical entity patent for
Fanapttm
will expire prior to the end of this
10-year
period of market exclusivity. However, there is no assurance
that we will receive the extensions of our patents or other
exclusive rights available under the Hatch-Waxman Act or similar
foreign legislation. If we fail to receive such extensions and
exclusive rights, our ability or our partners ability to
prevent competitors from manufacturing, marketing and selling
generic versions of our products or partnered products will be
materially impaired.
Litigation
or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement
could require us to divert resources and may prevent or delay
our drug discovery and development efforts.
Our commercial success depends in part on our not infringing the
patents and proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties
may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology
without authorization. In addition, third parties may obtain
patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies
infringes upon these patents. Furthermore, parties making claims
against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief,
which could effectively block our ability to develop and
commercialize one or more of our products. Defense of these
claims, regardless of their merit, would divert substantial
financial and employee resources from our business. In the event
of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to
pay substantial damages, obtain one or more licenses from third
parties or pay royalties. In addition, even in the absence of
litigation, we may need to obtain additional licenses from third
parties to advance our research or allow commercialization of
our products. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a
reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, if at all. In that
event, we would be unable to develop and commercialize further
one or more of our products.
In addition, in the future we could be required to initiate
litigation to enforce our proprietary rights against
infringement by third parties. Prosecution of these claims to
enforce our rights against others could
55
divert substantial financial and employee resources from our
business. If we fail to enforce our proprietary rights against
others, our business will be harmed.
If we
use hazardous and biological materials in a manner that causes
injury or violates applicable law, we may be liable for
damages.
Our research, development and commercialization activities
involve the controlled use of potentially hazardous substances,
including toxic chemical and biological materials. Although we
believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of
such materials comply with state and federal standards, there
will always be the risk of contamination, injury or other
damages resulting from these hazardous substances. If we were to
become liable for an accident, or if we or our partners were to
suffer an extended facility shutdown, we could incur significant
costs, damages and penalties that could materially harm our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, our operations produce hazardous waste products.
While third parties are responsible for disposal of our
hazardous waste, we could be liable under environmental laws for
any required cleanup of sites at which our waste is disposed.
Federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations govern
the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these
hazardous materials. If we fail to comply with these laws and
regulations at any time, or if they change, we may be subject to
criminal sanctions and substantial civil liabilities, which may
adversely affect our business.
Even if we continue to comply with all applicable laws and
regulations regarding hazardous materials, we cannot eliminate
the risk of accidental contamination or discharge and our
resultant liability for any injuries or other damages caused by
these accidents. Although we maintain pollution liability
insurance, our coverage limit under this insurance is
$2.0 million, and while we believe this amount and type of
insurance is sufficient to cover risks typically associated with
our handling of materials, the insurance may not cover all
environmental liabilities, and these limits may not be high
enough to cover potential liabilities for these damages fully.
The amount of uninsured liabilities may exceed our financial
resources and materially harm our business.
Risks
related to our common stock
Our
stock price has been highly volatile and may be volatile in the
future, and purchasers of our common stock could incur
substantial losses.
The realization of any of the risks described in these risk
factors or other unforeseen risks could have a dramatic and
adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Between
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, the high
and low sale prices of our common stock as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Market varied between $16.65 and $0.45.
Additionally, market prices for securities of biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies, including ours, have historically been
very volatile. The market for these securities has from time to
time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations for
reasons that were unrelated to the operating performance of any
one company.
The following factors, in addition to the other risk factors
described in this section, may also have a significant impact on
the market price of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
publicity regarding actual or potential testing or trial results
relating to products under development by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
the outcome of regulatory review relating to products under
development by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the U.S. and foreign countries
|
|
|
|
developments concerning any collaboration or other strategic
transaction we may undertake
|
|
|
|
announcements of patent issuances or denials, technological
innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
termination or delay of development or commercialization
program(s) by our corporate partners
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
safety issues with our products or those of our competitors
|
|
|
|
our partners ability to successfully commercialize our
partnered products
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully execute our commercialization
strategies
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new therapeutic
products or methods by us or others
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts or failure to meet such financial
expectations
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations or policies or patent decisions
|
|
|
|
changes in patent legislation or adverse changes to patent law
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel or members of our board
of directors
|
|
|
|
publicity regarding actual or potential transactions involving
us or
|
|
|
|
economic and other external factors beyond our control
|
As a result of these factors, holders of our common stock might
be unable to sell their shares at or above the price they paid
for such shares.
If
there are substantial sales of our common stock, our stock price
could decline.
A small number of institutional investors and private equity
funds hold a significant number of shares of our common stock.
Sales by these stockholders of a substantial number of shares,
or the expectation of such sales, could cause a significant
reduction in the market price of our common stock. Additionally,
a small number of early investors in our company have rights,
subject to certain conditions, to require us to file
registration statements to permit the resale of their shares in
the public market or to include their shares in registration
statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders.
In addition to our outstanding common stock, as of
September 30, 2009, there were a total of
4,320,992 shares of common stock that we have registered
and that we are obligated to issue upon the exercise of
currently outstanding options and restricted stock units granted
under our Second Amended and Restated Management Equity Plan and
2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon the exercise or settlement of
these options or restricted stock units, as the case may be, in
accordance with their respective terms, these shares may be
resold freely, subject to restrictions imposed on our affiliates
under Rule 144. If significant sales of these shares occur
in short periods of time, these sales could reduce the market
price of our common stock. Any reduction in the trading price of
our common stock could impede our ability to raise capital on
attractive terms.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports or publish unfavorable research about our business, our
stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on
the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts
who covers the Company downgrades our stock, our stock price
would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to
cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, interest in
the purchase of our stock could decrease, which could cause our
stock price or trading volume to decline.
Our
business could be negatively affected as a result of the actions
of activist stockholders.
Proxy contests have been waged against many companies in the
biopharmaceutical industry, including us, over the last few
years. If faced with another proxy contest, we may not be able
to respond successfully to the
57
contest, which would be disruptive to our business. Even if we
are successful, our business could be adversely affected by a
proxy contest involving us or our partners because:
|
|
|
|
|
responding to proxy contests and other actions by activist
stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting
operations and diverting the attention of management and
employees;
|
|
|
|
perceived uncertainties as to future direction may result in the
loss of potential acquisitions, collaborations or in-licensing
opportunities, and may make it more difficult to attract and
retain qualified personnel and business partners; and
|
|
|
|
if individuals are elected to a board of directors with a
specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to
effectively and timely implement our strategic plan and create
additional value for our stockholders.
|
These actions could cause our stock price to experience periods
of volatility.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter and bylaws, and in Delaware law, and
our rights plan could prevent or delay a change in control of
our company.
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions
of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may
discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting
us from engaging in a business combination with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes
an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be
beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may
discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or
control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of blank check preferred
stock that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a
takeover attempt
|
|
|
|
do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of
directors, which would allow holders of less than a majority of
the stock to elect some directors
|
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which
the successors to the directors whose terms have expired will be
elected to serve from the time of election and qualification
until the third annual meeting following their election
|
|
|
|
require that directors only be removed from office for cause
|
|
|
|
provide that vacancies on the board of directors, including
newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority
vote of directors then in office
|
|
|
|
limit who may call special meetings of stockholders
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all
actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates
for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters
that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings
|
Moreover, on September 25, 2008, our board of directors
adopted a rights agreement, the provisions of which could result
in significant dilution of the proportionate ownership of a
potential acquirer and, accordingly, could discourage, delay or
prevent a change in our management or control over us.
Our
investment portfolio may become impaired by further
deterioration of the capital markets.
We engage one or more third parties to manage some of our cash
consistent with an investment policy that allows a range of
investments and maturities. The investments are intended to
preserve principal while providing liquidity adequate to meet
projected cash requirements. Risks of principal loss are
intended to be minimized through diversified short and medium
term investments of high quality, but the investments are not,
58
in every case, guaranteed or fully insured. In light of recent
changes in the credit market, some high quality short-term
investment securities, similar to the types of securities that
we invest in, have suffered illiquidity or events of default.
From time to time, we may suffer losses on our marketable
securities, which could have a material adverse impact on our
operations.
As a result of current adverse financial market conditions,
investments in some financial instruments, such as auction rate
securities and asset backed debt securities, may pose risks
arising from liquidity and credit concerns. We have limited
holdings of these investments in our portfolio, however, the
current disruptions in the credit and financial markets have
negatively affected investments in many industries, including
those in which we invest. The current global economic crisis has
had, and may continue to have, a negative impact on the market
values of the investments in our investment portfolio. We cannot
predict future market conditions or market liquidity and there
can be no assurance that the markets for these securities will
not deteriorate further or that the institutions that these
investments are with will be able to meet their debt obligations
at the time we may need to liquidate such investments or until
such time as the investments mature.
Unstable
market, credit and financial conditions may exacerbate certain
risks affecting our business and have serious adverse
consequences on our business.
The recent economic downturn and market instability has made the
business climate more volatile and more costly. Our general
business strategy may be adversely affected by unpredictable and
unstable market conditions. If the current equity and credit
markets deteriorate further, or do not improve, it may make any
necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly,
and more dilutive. While we believe we have adequate capital
resources to meet current working capital and capital
expenditure requirements, a lingering economic downturn or
significant increase in our expenses could require additional
financing on less than attractive rates or on terms that are
excessively dilutive to existing stockholders. Failure to secure
any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable
terms could have a material adverse effect on our stock price
and could require us to delay or abandon clinical development
plans.
Sales of our products and partnered products will be dependent,
in large part, on reimbursement from government health
administration authorities, private health insurers,
distribution partners and other organizations. As a result of
the current credit and financial market conditions, these
organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement
obligations or may delay payment. In addition, federal and state
health authorities may reduce Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursements, and private insurers may increase their scrutiny
of claims. A reduction in the availability or extent of
reimbursement could negatively affect our or our partners
product sales and revenue. Customers may also reduce spending
during times of economic uncertainty.
In addition, we rely on third parties for several important
aspects of our business. For example, we depend upon
collaborators for both manufacturing and royalty revenue and the
clinical development of collaboration products, we use third
party contract research organizations for many of our clinical
trials, and we rely upon several single source providers of raw
materials and contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our
products and product candidates. Due to the recent tightening of
global credit and the continued deterioration in the financial
markets, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance
of our third party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. If
such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to
us, our business would be adversely affected.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
None.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
59
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
On August 27, 2009, we held our 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. At the meeting, the following matters were
approved by the votes specified below:
1. Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. and Argeris N.
Karabelas, Ph.D were elected to serve as directors of Vanda
until the 2012 annual meeting or until their successors are duly
elected and qualified. With respect to Dr. Polymeropoulos,
14,672,549 shares of common stock were voted in favor of
his election and 6,827,304 shares of common stock were
withheld. With respect to Dr. Karabelas,
13,766,149 shares of common stock were voted in favor of
his election and 7,733,704 shares were withheld. There were
no abstentions or broker non-votes. The terms of
Messrs. Dugan, Pien, Ramsay and Watkins and Dr. Halak
continued after the meeting.
2. The ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year
ending December 31, 2009 was approved. The votes were cast
as follows: 21,337,659 shares of common stock were voted
for the ratification, 143,210 shares of common stock were
voted against the ratification and 18,983 shares of common
stock abstained from the vote. There were no broker non-votes.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
November 4, 2009
/s/ Mihael
H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.
Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)
November 4, 2009
Stephanie R. Irish
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal financial and accounting officer)
61
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
62
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
b. designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
d. disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
/s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos
|
|
|
Mihael H. Polymeropoulos
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Stephanie R. Irish, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
b. designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
d. disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
/s/ Stephanie R. Irish
|
|
|
Stephanie R. Irish
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification
Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., (the
Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such
officers knowledge, that:
The Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
Form 10-Q)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the
Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
/s/ Mihael H. Polymeropoulos
|
|
|
Mihael H. Polymeropoulos
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
/s/ Stephanie R. Irish
|
|
|
Stephanie R. Irish
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request. This
certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the
Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.